Rachel Sylvester
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Gordon Brown's favourite children's book is The Snail and the Whale, which describes how a tiny snail hitches a ride on a humpback whale. Together they tour the world, passing icebergs and volcanoes, sharks and penguins. The snail begins to feel very small and powerless compared to the world he sees. But in the end, when the whale is beached, it is the snail who saves his life.
The question is - when it comes to public service reform, is the Prime Minister a slow and cautious snail or a speedy and powerful whale? It is perhaps revealing that in Mr Brown's choice of bedtime reading for his sons, it is the snail who wins.
In the weeks before Mr Brown moved into No10 he used to ask journalists, plaintively: “What do I have to do to convince you that I'm a reformer?” He knew - and he still knows - that the reputation he acquired as Chancellor of being a “roadblock to reform” would be deadly at the next election with voters who increasingly want value for money from the public services. After years of trying to stop Mr Blair being too radical on schools and hospitals, he has spent his first year as leader apparently trying to trump him.
Yesterday Lord Darzi of Denham's report on the health service called for hospitals to be funded on the basis of the quality of their care. In recent months, Mr Brown has announced an expansion of the city academy programme, published eye-catching proposals on the environment and called for large sections of the welfare state to be handed to the private sector. In a report published by the Cabinet Office last week he even said that he wanted to build on the “success of the foundation trust model in the NHS” and create a “growing role for independent public service providers, voluntary organisations and social enterprises” in the provision of public services.
When Mr Brown was at the Treasury he did all he could to block the creation of foundation hospitals - before one crucial Cabinet meeting he circulated a 100-page document detailing everything that was wrong with them. He shredded David Freud's proposals for welfare reform and was reluctant to support Adair Turner's ideas for transforming the pensions system. He was deeply sceptical about opening up the education system to other providers. One Cabinet minister recalls the extraordinary lengths to which Mr Brown went to avoid even stepping through the door of a city academy when visiting a constituency in which it was clearly the best school. At a moment of particular tension with Mr Blair about the role of the private sector in the provision of public services, Mr Brown made a speech emphasising the “limits of the market” in hospitals and schools.
Has he changed his mind or is he guilty of political opportunism? It is hard to avoid coming to the conclusion that Mr Brown was so angry with Mr Blair over the leadership that he wanted to cause trouble. As one Downing Street aide says: “By the end, if Tony was in favour of something, Gordon was on principle against it.” As Chancellor, Mr Brown was positioning himself to the left of Mr Blair to curry favour with the Labour Party. Now that he is Prime Minister, he is positioning himself as a moderniser to appeal to the wider electorate.
The problem is that this makes it difficult for him to sound authentic when he talks about public service reform. As one Labour insider says: “It's like he's talking English as a second language when he talks about reform. It's slightly off key.”
Certainly, there are differences of tone with his predecessor. While Mr Blair emphasised the importance of excellence, Mr Brown emphasises fairness too. He is more cautious about proposals that could create inequalities and therefore less ideologically committed to market reforms. The Blairite watchword was “choice”, the Brownites want people to have a “voice” - through local consultations and customer satisfaction surveys for example.
“For some services increasing choice is not the only or best course of action to raise performance,” the Cabinet Office document states.
I am told that Lord Darzi originally wanted to propose in his report that people with chronic conditions such as diabetes or asthma should be given an individual budget with which to fund their own care. This would have been a significant transfer of power to the patient - but it was seen as risky by the Department of Health and No10 who feared the feckless might blow the money on a Caribbean tour.
Instead, there will be a pilot scheme - although the surgeon-minister played hard ball and managed to get the words “with a view to national roll-out” inserted into the document at the last minute.
There is a similar ambiguity about schools. Mr Brown has announced his intention to “accelerate” the city academies programme - but many of the key freedoms given to them by Mr Blair have been watered down. City academies will in future have to teach the national curriculum, lose flexibility over their staff and be brought more under the control of local education authorities. Ed Balls is also keen to create dividing lines with the Conservatives by waging war on faith and grammar schools - to the intense irritation of his Blairite schools minister Lord Adonis. Mr Blair's view was that excellence would trickle down the system, Mr Brown wants equity enforced across the board. It is a subtle but important shift.
One Cabinet minister says: “Gordon is not doing a U-turn but he has moved into the slow lane.” Another believes that there is a tension between Mr Brown's head and heart. A senior civil servant, who works closely with him, is more blunt: “He fudges everything.”
As a result, the message is confused. On the public services, as on the economy Mr Brown is trapped by his own past. He spent so long playing the role of the snail that he cannot now look like a natural whale.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think he's more of a ostrich in cloud cuckoo land...
Rob, B'ham, UK
Gordon sadly is just not up to being PM. He has no vision, he can't communicate and he can't make decisions quickly which I would have thought were all essential qualities for being PM. I can see him in No 10 and a civil servant saying what should we do PM? and Gordon saying I don't know.He must go
Rupert, London, UK
Brown unelected? He was elected by the Labour MPs & many people elected the Labour MPs.
ian cheese, london, uk
Or cautious whale, or powerfull snail? Brown both!
geoffrey swain, Almancil, Portugal
Lets face it the unelected Brown along with his govenment is a spent force the sooner there is freash blood at number 10 the better!
Dave Farmer, Broxbourne, England
Sir,
All these so called reforms amount to more than perpetuating the mith of political concern. All neglect the individual. Everybody is different allow to rise or fall on their own merit. Teacher are to individuals some inspire, some dull but at the end produce individuals not cogs. Gov allow.
Terence E Rowe, Blackburn, England
the Brownites want people to have a voice - through local consultations and customer satisfaction surveys for example
Yes, a voice that is very easy to ignore.
Chris, Wiltshire,
I can't remember a time when the health service wasn't being reorgnised or reformed.
It is time to recognise that the problem isn't the schools or hospitals, it is the Government. They need to get out out of being able to stick their noses in whenever it pleases them.
Abolish LEAs for a start.
Gary Hyans, Bryansk, Russia
The government and Mr Brown in particular will say or do or 'believe in' anything, just anything that will make them more popular, whether for the common good or not.
Spin and PR is king, reason is forgotten, the people can eat cake.
Bad government is dangerous and divisive. We need an election
David, St Albans, uk
Since the NHS now employs hundreds of thousands of 'managers' they have to be given something to do.
Frank Uptun, Solihull,
Brown is never going to reform,he is a diehard Marxist of the most entrenched kind. Whenever he stated publicly he would take a moderate approach, he countered this by stealth actions and deceit. This is real emperors new clothes stuff,he'll say one thing to gain favour and as usual do the opposite
Bryan, Totland , UK
Choice is not the issue, performance is. Whats the point of choice between the nearest hospital, and the next nearest one one 25 miles away. Or the local school, and one thats 45 minutes bus ride away for the children. Not everybody lives in metropolitan areas.
Dave, Liverpool, UK
Gordon Brown has frequently said one thing but acted differently. Advocated competition but overseen momumental bureacracy and red-tape. Talked prudence and spent money rashly. Now reforming but only within his constraints. Can a leopard change its spots, or a snail its shell?
Unlikely.
Mike Daly, Maidenhead, Berkshire
To celebrate his first year, Brown's lot published a brochure entitled 'Excellence, Fairness and World-Class Services' or some similar bag of moonshine. Which world were we being compared to, one wonders. I thought he had already made a U-turn and was backing into everything as a result.
john problem, winchester, uk
If I was chronically ill, the last thing I would need would be to be given a budget and told to get on with it. Give the money to the experts in the NHS hospitals, so that they have the resources to provide top quality care.
Dave, Liverpool, UK
We are talking about re-organisation NOT reform. Reform suggests a desired OUTCOME made reality at a stroke by legislation - as in votes for women. Re-organisation involves choice and the avoidance of pitfalls even disaster. Thats why Blair talked "reform" - as if the benefits were alreadycertain
Bob T, London, UK
I'd take Blair anytime, take him where further away from me, as for Brown he is a turn coat of the worse kind and not a bloke I'd trust.
New Labour old Tories.
Robert , Swansea, wales
We are told Mr Brown is a highly principled dedicated and hard working unelected Prime Minister. But his actions suggest he would stand on his head if it would help him hang on to power.
Simon Marshland, Bath, UK
"hospitals to be funded on the basis of the quality of their care"
Surely then patients who may now be getting a low standard of care will get an even lower one in the future? For good care you need proper discipline (!) and vocation in hospitals at fair rates of pay. Bring back proper matrons.
Amin Aswet, Gibraltar,
Brown is the worst Labour PM ever. What made him think he had the right to undermine and force out the best? The incompetence and arrogance of the man are astounding. Still, through his utter uselessness, he's making Blair look even better by the day; that must really hurt!
David, Ely, UK
I'd rather be a snail. The whale, because of its size, muddies the waters & it is the snail whose job it is to clean up after.
ian cheese, london, uk
I'm prepared to bet good money that the people's "Voice" is drowned out by those of producer interests within the NHS and education system (not to mention those of politicians).
Only when taxpayers can vote with their feet (and money) will we see real improvement.
HJ, Reading, UK
Gordon Brown should be ashamed of what he did to Tony Blair. A year in office has proven how right Blair was to resist Brown's absurd demands that somehow he deserved his "turn". What a pity Blair eventually gave in.
Tony Hopkins, London, UK
No choice - but allowed a voice. Sounds like the Lisbon ConTreaty. Our Dear Leader made the choice but we were allowed to voice an opinion on the Downing Street petitions website, which he then ignored. After all, Gordon knows best & why should he take any notice of people who never elected him.
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
Seeing Brown run the country is like watching a car crash in slow motion. I'd take Blair any day!
simon, london,
For Brown and his government it is all too late. Trust has gone and as a result nobody any longer believes a word they say and in fact very few are even bothering to listen any more.
The death of this government will be a slow lingering affair.
regor1, cardiff,
Mr Brown brought in a breath of fresh air, and not seen as Cons/ lite like Blair. He has now become so right wing in everything he touches.. Attacks on the sick, disabled, the poor, smokers drinkers who's next? History has seen this before in 1930's Germany.
James , Brighton, England
Of course Gordon isn't doing a U-Turn. That would presume he was going somewhere in the first place.
John Goode, Welwyn Garden City, UK