Rachel Johnson
Stories and Songs on today's free French CD, with The Times
First we had Cherie whining, as she decanted some vegetable soup from Chequers into a saucepan, that we weren’t paying for her to have a chef at Downing Street and she had to provide meals for her family because “no one else was volunteering”.
Then we had the news that working women are refusing to have second children, a sort of Lysistratan protest against the “triple burden” of working, doing all the childcare and two-thirds of the housework. And, oh yes, we also heard in the same report, entitled Family Work and Selection into Parenthood among British Couples by Pia Schober, presented at the British Household Panel Survey 2007 conference, that the new man is about as common as rocking-horse s***.
I have tried to lay aside my own agenda, and look with a clear eye at the mess we have got into with all this, with working mothers more Domestos devils than domestic goddesses, and have come up with a very uncomfortable conclusion.
But first, I would just like to say that I am right behind the movement to get men off the couch and out of the cave and into the kitchen and behind the fridge with the Cillit Bang, especially if their wives are mothers and earners too.
Men, if you’re reading this, please lay down the paper for a second and consider what you and your female partner have done over the course of this weekend. Which one of you cooked, cleaned, shopped, washed up, hung up the towels, made the beds, straightened the house, swept the floor, collected the recycling materials, put the children to bed, and which one of you read the papers, went for a run, cooked up a gourmet storm using every pan in the house and responded to a pleasantly voiced request to put their dirty plate in the dishwasher, please? I don’t know, but I can guess.
For some reason, men and women – sorry for the generalisation, but you know what I mean – are put together differently when it comes to the domestic sphere. Men seem to coexist happily with dirty plates and wet towels and muddy floors, indeed, they barely notice them, but these things cause women almost physical pain. There must be a reason.
And it must be this, that we bring up males to assume that housework and childcare, and maintenance and repetitive gruntwork – what the classical economists tellingly call “reproduction” work rather than “paid” work – is a woman’s preserve, and simply not their business. Every other day, it seems, I receive books in the post, called things such as How to Get it All Done or the Busy Mum’s Handbook, that are supposed to help women like me “navigate” our three areas of responsibility without going bonkers or getting divorced.
But this all brings us back to us, to women. Who brings up boys? Who juggles? Well, we do, of course, while our lazy husbands loaf about, right? I was chatting to another mother one summer, in a rented villa. Her 15-year-old son came in, rumpled in pyjamas, and sat down at the table. It was 11am. She fetched a bowl, with a sacramental air, and put it in front of him. Then she fetched a spoon. Then the milk from the fridge. Then the cereal from the cupboard. Then she tipped the cereal into the hulking lad’s bowl, and added the milk. For a wild moment I thought she was going to spoon the cornflakes into his mouth.
In Italy, three out of 10 divorces are caused by what frustrated wives call “mammoni”, men who are deeply attached to their mothers, who insist on indulging their sons, doing their cooking and laundry, cleaning their apartments and so on, well into adulthood.
It seems to me – as the quite frankly adoring mother of two cosseted sons – that this is where the problem starts. Even as we whinge about our burdens, we are somehow failing to stop the rot and to bring up our sons to be helpful husbands.
We will never breed the heroic generation of new men until women have learnt how to be new mothers first.

Would I be available to do BBC Breakfast, the producer asks. I hesitate.
I do love my sleep and the programme starts before most teenagers have gone to bed.
“What time?” is my first question, rather than “what on?” So I am already breaking my first rule, one that I often piously advise others to follow but rarely observe myself, which is don’t go on unless you have something to say.
“Between eight and nine,” the producer responds pleasantly, which is the answer I am looking for, so I accept even though the subject under discussion is – even by my lowly standards – so insubstantial as to be almost weightless. As I live only 10 minutes from Television Centre, I can see my morning panning out nicely. Get up at half-seven, do a quick turn, walk the dog, latte . . .
At 5.45am precisely the telephone by my bed peals. “Your car’s outside,” says a voice. Whaaat?
I turn on my mobile and there are six missed calls, all from BBC producers, from midnight onwards, trying to reach me to tell me that I am now, due to a rejigging of the running order, on at 6.20am and again an hour later to disclose my insights to the nation.
I hurl on clothes, whiz to White City, twirl in and out of make-up, and then go on set.
I retire to the green room to await my next appearance. Then I start to feel a little silly. In one corner, a bearded imam is eating a scone and discussing the Muslim mood with a security expert, who is checking his BlackBerry and fielding calls from other media outlets.
In another Melanie Phillips, the columnist, is in conversation with Frank Gardner, the BBC’s wheelchair-bound, dignified and impressive security correspondent.
I grab a tub of fruit salad, sit down in a corner, head down. But the imam politely asks me, “So, what are you here to talk about?”
I look around the room. He is asking me on what subject I have risen at sparrow’s fart, at a critical moment of national security, to discuss on live television.
I wonder whether to say “Jacqui Smith’s cleavage”, or to admit the truth, which is that I am exclusively revealing my views on the unwelcome new trend of parents competing to give teachers the most lavish present at the end of term.
But for once, my mouth opens and no words come out.

Rachel Johnson has written for among others, the Daily Telegraph, the Spectator, the Evening Standard and Easy Living, and is author of The Mummy Diaries and Notting Hell. She is married with three children and lives in London. Her column appears weekly in The Sunday Times.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Well Mat in Sidney,
No we are not all as fortunate as your girlfriend (live in I assume). I cannot get my husband motivated to do anything around the house and I make more money then he does plus go to school full time in the evenings. He cannot even manage to pay the bills without me having to remind him.
Annette, Austin, TX
Totally agree with the article. I have brought up both my sons to take their share of the chores since they were old enough - from about age 5. They now both take their turn at cooking, and housework, including cleaning toilets. That certainly helped them all appreciate the problem that the male of the species creates. Their dad has always been very good at helping out, and as we are all soon to be working people the chores list will be up for review very shortly. When asked what qualities they would look for in their ideal partner, they both wanted to have a lady that would coddle them like my mother did whenever they were there for their tea!
Isla from Scotland
Isla Cruden, Kiltarlity, Inverness-shire
I assume David Morrison must surely have been badly damaged by a woman to write with such vitriol. (Or did I miss the joke?) If he thinks a wife is a mother I am seriously worried about his grasp on the subject although it could explain an awful lot! He does have a point about learning to do chores though, it is very easy indeed to clean and cook adequately and many men have dodged these tasks for far too long. I also happen to agree that some mothers actively keep their sons dependent upon them for absolutely selfish reasons. It's all a question of balance really.
Christine Kilby, BRAMSHALL , Staffs
Isn't it time we left this generalised stereotyping behind? It is the 21st Century after all?
I've not lived with a woman (either as a flatmate or partner) who was more tidier than myself. My girlfriend and I split the domestic chores between us and do what we prefer. She hates cooking whilst I love it and she does the washing. Neither of us feel "Exploited".
Mat, Sydney, Australia (Expat)
I have every symphathy with this article. Since agreeing to live with my boyfriend and his older brother in a join attempt by all three of us to get on the property ladder I have endured endless comments from their family about their expectations of my 'house-training' my boyfriends brother. I want to yell at them 'thats your job he's your son' but actually its me and his brother that have patiently trained him not to leave skid-marked pants on the kettle over the course of six-months, to occasionally wash his towel or wear a belt when in his dressing gown so he doesn't flash the neighbours. This is all carried out with door slamming tantrums when you carefully mention anything he might dislike hearing.
If this experience isn't enough to make me bring up my own children to look after themselves whatever there sex I don't know what is.
Sally, Southampton,
It would be far better for your sons to learn that women are fickle, untrustworthy and have the law firmly on their side. No man should marry for no woman is worth the long term pain that marriage brings.
Only the brainwashed husband enjoys marriage.
Consequently your sons need to look after themselves including keeping the house tidy, cooking and ironing. By keeping them dependent on Mum you merely train them for misery.
Only once your sons realise that housekeeping is really rather easy will they be free of Mum's apron strings. What is a man's wife but his mother?
Women are needed for the normal sport of a well rounded life but not for more.
Happiness is oneself. Marriage is merely another word for misery. It may take time to develop but misery comes and is unavoidable.
David Morrison, Airdrie, UK
Ha, ha Bob in Haverhill - the funniest (if most convoluted) excuse I've ever heard for not doing the washing up: "it's biological differences!!". Well, I would wholeheartedly agree with Rachel - women do ruin their sons but I would also add that they ruin their husbands by letting them get away with doing no housework. Go on a housework strike and see how long the "biological differences" last.
My husband was reared on a strict diet of tough love and independence and is neater and more house-proud than I am. It's usually he who has to prompt me to help him hoover or wash up. I, on the other hand, was raised by a mother who insisted on doing everything for me and cleaned up after all her children, including my brother who is now still dependent on home-cooked meals and ironed shirts. It's all in the upbringing.
MB, Edinburgh,
Rachel, you really cannot accept, can you, that there are actual biological differences not only in the physical makeup of the bodies of men and women, but in the way their minds work? As usual, you jump to the conclusion that, if men and women have different outlooks, it must, necessarily, be because they have been brought up differently. This attitude, in the face of mounting evidence that men's and women's brains actually function differently, is absurd. It is driven merely by the need to 'explain' why men are more successful than women at some things (and indeed vice versa). No amount of evidence will ever jolt the faith of the true feminist, since it means accepting that they might never be able to make men and women interchangeable. Have you noticed how your final paragraph is the mirror image of old-fashioned, discredited eugenics proponents? Just as they failed to grasp that there is more to humans than their genes, you, just as erroneously, cannot see more than conditioning
Bob, Haverhill, England
Women have very poor insight into their own psychology. What they say and how they choose sexual partners are two very different things.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
"House-Trained" - the two sweetest words you can hear describing a prospective boyfriend!
Jennifer Chambers, Bradford,
I think that housework and childcare are not very similar at all and it irks me to have them somewhat equated. Housework is a norm, and your price for life on the planet - to pick up after yourself. Nobody would expect the state to help with your energy needed for doing your own dishes or making your bed if you are healthy and able to do those tasks.
But childcare is by definition broader- it is care of someone not yourself. It is othe-centred and a service role not required for your own survival. In that regard those who take care of children are nurturing other citizens, future earners and productive workers and the role of caregiving is vital to the continuing of any society. It is vital work.
When we ask for governments to value housework, that is sort of nonsense. But when we ask for governments to value childcare that is a vital part of the women's equality struggle since the role has to date been devalued as useless which of course it is not. Boys can do both roles too.
Beverley Smith, Calgary, Alberta, Canada