Rosie Millard
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

So the grumpy £830m juggernaut that is Sir Alan Sugar goes rumbling into the fourth series of his ball-breaking show The Apprentice. And once again, as well as being a show-case for some of the most ambitious people in the country, it is serving as a platform for the Amstrad and Viglen chairman’s trenchant views on business.
Last week the target was women in the workplace. Top of Sugar’s grumble list is the fact that working women may actually have babies and may occasionally need maternity leave. “People are entitled to have too much. Everything has gone too far,” he says.
Furthermore Sugar – who once signed a birthday card to Ann, his wife of 40 years, with the words: “from Alan Sugar”– is rather cheesed off that it is now illegal to quiz potential female employees about their breeding ambitions.
“It’s got to such a state now that you can’t ask the obvious questions,” he moans. On the other hand he seems rather in awe of stiletto-heeled ladies in the boardroom. “Be under no illusion. There are women employers who are more ruthless than men.”
Really? To test what it’s like working under Sugar, I ask two women with expert knowledge: Katie Hopkins, who got to the semi-finals of last year’s show and then resigned; and Michelle Dewberry, who won The Apprentice in 2006, got the prize – a job with Sugar’s firm – but then left after less than 12 months.
“Well,” says Hopkins, 33, who now has a burgeoning media career, “if you were choosing between male and female candidates for a job, and they were equally matched, you would pick the male because of maternity leave. Women of childbearing age are a liability, especially for medium-scale employers. Pregnant women are a litigious timebomb.”
Blimey, Katie. That’s a bit steep, surely?
“I am a woman and I know the cunning of my own kind,” responds Hopkins coolly. “I have been party to a whole host of conversations where pregnant friends say: ‘I’ll go back for two weeks and then hand in my notice’. They know what they are doing, and they play the game.”
That’s not all. Apparently women are likely to drag their feet even when they come back from maternity leave. According to Hopkins, this is particularly rife in the caring sector.
“I come from the school where women organise childcare properly, but there are a number of examples where working women end up letting down the side. That’s why you see an enormous number of mothers working in human resources or the public sector. These are lax places where you can hide away, underperform and still get your pay cheque.”
But didn’t Hopkins herself “let down the side” somewhat? Having achieved her 15 minutes of fame, she abruptly withdrew from the show, citing as her reason the care of her two young children.
“I gave [Sugar] my honest reaction, which was that I wouldn’t get my childcare organised in time to be in Brentwood [Sugar’s Amstrad headquarters] with him in a week.”
Wasn’t she behaving just as he fears women always do when they have to choose between family and work commitments?
Hopkins doesn’t see it that way. “Viewers probably don’t realise that we didn’t have access to phones, and I couldn’t check that my nanny would be available [if I won]. I’m a single mother and rely on my nanny. Reality shows hide details like that.”
Whatever the reason, the exposure meant Hopkins was prime reality TV fodder; soon afterwards she landed a berth on I’m a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here! (by which time she presumably had the necessary childcare arrangements in place). Indeed, she now claims to spend 50% of her working week in media jobs (for the other half she does business consulting).
And she’s clearly a fan of the old grump. “Sir Alan is old-school, but I like his simplistic way of being. Quite a lot of what he says is very true. I’d choose a man to work for me over a woman of childbearing age. And I think, as bosses, women are much more ruthless than men because they’ve had to fight to get there.”
Does that mean she is ruthless? “Well, the chubby-mummy brigade call me ruthless. [By that] I mean the sort of woman who thinks driving a Volvo is exciting or who gets excited by a trip to the supermarket. I think that’s just jealousy. They’ve opted for an easier way of life and don’t want to see success in a woman. If I were a man, they’d call me a high-achiever.”
All good fighting talk but utterly outdated, according to the petite but steely Dewberry. Now 28 the 2006 Apprentice winner thinks such beliefs about women in power are old hat.
“I don’t believe in this whole gender-split discussion,” she says.
“People are people. I don’t get intimidated by people and I don’t intimidate others.” Dewberry, who now runs her own consulting company, says that before her stint with Sugar she worked for plenty of women who were anything but ruthless.
“My last four bosses were all female, and I have nothing but respect for the women I’ve worked for. My last boss, Mary Turner, is the CEO of Tiscali [the internet service provider]. She has children and she is incredibly successful.”
It’s not hard to see why Sugar was impressed by Dewberry, a former shelf stacker from Hull who had a brutal upbringing at the hands of an alcoholic father. Yet she articulates a clear vision of modern management aims that go completely against Sugar’s.
“Alan’s style is nononsense whereas I believe in soft management, with a good work-life balance,” she says. “Alan is very old-fashioned in his management style. Despite being pioneering with technology, he’s not [interested in] flexible and remote working.
“Prior to The Apprentice I was working as a consultant. I was led by targets. No one ever ordered me to sit in an office from nine to five. You don’t manage people by the amount of time they sit in the office.”
Although her period in Sugar’s empire was marked by the revelation she was pregnant by fellow contestant Syed Ahmed (she subsequently suffered a miscarriage), Dewberry is quite clear about her views on mothers in the workplace. Children, she says, don’t come into the equation. And old-fashioned managers should wake up to this.
“It’s not just Alan Sugar – there is this male mentality, which is that when they interview a lady, they look at her as a baby-making machine. That’s an incredibly wrong way of approaching the employment of anyone. When someone walks into an interview, first and foremost they are there because of their skills and talents. Modern-day managers need to be looking at people for the value they bring to the organisations.”
So is Sugar wrong to moan about not being able to ask women questions relating to their personal circum-stances?
Dewberry snorts. “If you ask people what their views are on pregnancy, how far will you take it? Will you ask them about their menstrual cycle? Will you ask them about period pain? Or whether they have endome-triosis? Where do you draw the line? Women didn’t choose to be the gender that carries babies and we shouldn’t be penalised.”
Is Sugar a silly, sexist chap, then? “To say he’s sexist is not right – otherwise how could he have ended up with two women at the finals,” she observes. “I think Alan just needs to advance his management style a little and realise that you can get a whole lot more from people if you develop flexibility in the way you treat them.”
Whereas Hopkins has been glued to the new series of The Apprentice, Dewberry is perfectly happy to leave the past behind. “No, I haven’t been watching it, I’ve been out working. I think Alan would approve of that.”
Sugar on women
Women working together can sometimes be very difficult with each other: they can have lots of backbiting and jockeying for position
If someone comes into an interview and you think to yourself there’s a possibility that this woman might have a child and therefore take time off, it is a bit of a psychological negative thought
The woman employer is far more ruthless than the man. A woman employer is sitting there thinking, hmm, is she going to get married? Is she going to have kids? They’re worse than the men. Mercenary
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
So, SAS is a sexist pig, for not taking on Katie Hopkins.
Actually, if he had employed this woman, he would need his head examining.
As for Michelle, what type of insult is it to SAS, that she obtained a job, and then fell pregnant.
I hire and fire. I will not employ women of this age.
Rosemary C Taylor, Cambridge,
I would never employ anyone who has ambition to breed.
First of all there is no way that you are going to persuade a breeder that a deadline is more important than Timmy's homework and secondly I am morally against supporting population growth.
I would definitely be more lenient with anyone who has adopted a child.
When are people, governments and economists going to realise that this planet is full?
Kim, Cape Town, South Africa
Ahh the shrill emotional protests of the entitlement freakery brigade. The truth is that Katie Hopkins *is* right and many women cynically play the game for their maternity leave. It is also right to say that women going off on mat leave can have a significant impact on business, especially smaller to medium sized businesses. I can see why many people would discriminate against women of a child bearing age.
RJ, London,
Men will soon have equal rights to paternity leave, does that mean we need to exclude a whole age group from the workforce - or should we work round it. Live and work in balance.
Accept that people have lives and work lives and help them to match the two - see lifeworklife.co.uk
Bringing up children is a great for learning about life and the skills you learn are applicable in the workplace. Perhaps it will end up being wound in to job descriptions!!!!!
Kirsten Hemingway, Bleadon, Somerst
Really can't be doing with AS, but I would be very interested to see him in No.10. I bet he'd sort the dross out
Bob, Warrington, Cheshire
Unfortunately, Katie Hopkins is right. However, it only goes to show how little support there is out there for working mothers. Employers and the government need to make conditions more favourable for woman. If there was affordable and reliable childcare, woman could take on more work repsonsibilites. Furthermore, flexible working hours and the ability to work at home would allow woman to run their work around their children better. Also maternity leave is not particularily well paid and living with a new baby is not a party!
Sugar's business relies on having a workforce in the future. To do this woman need to have children. We need the next generation. Woman should be supported not discouraged. Furthermore, maybe fathers could be expected to take more responsibility.
laura, edinburgh,
I think Michelle is great.
Having read her book, she is honest, upfront and open.
best of luck to her... she was always way to good to work for Alan Sugar!!
lj, london,
What piffle Alex of Surrey. I find Dewberry to be spot on. The others are dinosaurs, and like dinosaurs their views shall become extinct. Everyone knows there are good emplyees out there and there is the dross. Gender is not involved. The mothers who work for me are committed. If their children are ill and they need time of I support them. That increases their commitment, obviously. I'd employ Hopkins only if you put a gun to my head.
S Greaves, Huddersfield, west Yorks
I suspect that there are many small businesses who need to have someone they can rely on. Unfortunately they think that women with children, or anticipating having children, are apt to disappear and be less reliable than men.
I think without real data this sort of debate is only one of my opinion is this...
Jim Symcox, Manchester, UK
It's weird, the company I work for goes out of its way to accommodate parents. Oddly enough it made a record profit last year. Can't be that much of a problem, then.
M.R., Stockport,
Incredibly I tend to fall with the opinion of Katie Hopkins even though she was a quite unlikable creature on the previous series of the apprentice- there is a ring of truth about her opinions of other women,
Michelle Dewberry has something unpleasantly deceitful about her that I cant quite put my finger on or articulate I'm afraid and the wide-eyed doe act doesnt quite cut it with me.
I was born into a family of 4 sisters and many aunts and was witness to the many ploys they would get up to to get their way in work, at play or whatever they wanted from friends and family so maybe I'm a little coloured by my views on women.
Alex Lee, Carshalton, UK/ Surrey
I forgot to add that as an employer myself I tend to agree with Sir Alans veiws in this particular manner
Alex Lee, Carshalton, UK/ Surrey
Good grief. Is this what it has come to? It's hardly encouraging for future generations. To be perfectly frank, if men could conceive babies, go through pregnancy, labour; who wouldn't let them? And yet, may i point out that men get paternity leave too? Perhaps they will quit abruptly afterwards to become a full time dad. Is it legal to ask if they have a female partner of childbearing age? Why on earth should the gender of a possibly employeemake any difference whatsoever to their ability to do the job? Is Sir Alan against pregnancy? Would he rather their were no children? Actully, perhaps that's an unfair question, as, by the sounds of it, he probably would.
Felicity Davies, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire