Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Anita Roddick, the late founder of the Body Shop, fulfilled her promise that she would not leave one penny of her multimillion-pound fortune to her children in her will.
The retailer gave £51 million to her charitable foundation before she died last year aged 64, leaving an estate of £655,747, which will go to the taxman. Her net worth is listed as nil.
It is understood that hundreds of thousands of pounds in death duties became liable on gifts of money she gave to family and friends shortly before her unexpected death, last September, from a brain haemorrhage. Large cash gifts escape inheritance tax only if the donor survives for seven years after the money is transferred.
Dame Anita once described the idea of bequeathing her fortune to her children as obscene. “I told my kids that they would not inherit one penny,” she said. “The money that we make from the company goes into the Body Shop Foundation, which isn’t one of those awful tax shelters, like some in America. It just functions to take the money and give it away.”
Gordon Roddick, Dame Anita’s husband and business partner, will not be wanting for money, however. He will have his share of the £100 million the couple received when they sold the Body Shop in 2005. The couple owned 18 per cent of the company, which was bought for £625 million by L’Oréal, the French cosmetics giant.
Dame Anita gave her share of the profits to the Roddick Foundation, which supports charities such as Chicken Shed Theatre, Greenpeace and Amnesty International. The charity gives away up to £2.5 million a year.
The couple’s two daughters, Sam and Justine, have previously said that they supported their mother’s decision to disinherit them. Sam, 35, who runs Coco de Mer, an upmarket sex shop, said in an interview before her mother’s death that it was a relief. “If the money was divided between family members, I suppose it would be natural to equate the amount that you were left with the amount that you were loved, which makes it very complicated and emotional.
“If my mum had said to me, ‘I’m not leaving the money to you but I’ve decided to give it all to a distant cousin’, then I would have found that offensive. But giving it all to charity is different. You can’t argue about someone giving their money away, can you? They’ve already given us everything in terms of love and support.”
Dame Anita was told in 2004 that she had hepatitis C, contracted through a blood tranfusion when she gave birth to Sam in 1971. She had cirrhosis of the liver and needed a transplant, but appeared to be fighting the disease. Her collapse, at her home in West Sussex, came as a shock.
“Money does not mean anything to me,” she once said. “The worst thing is greed - the accumulation of money.”
Strong willpower
— Joan Crawford cut her two eldest children, Christina and Christopher from her will. Christina later published Mommie Dearest, about her mother’s abusive treatment
— Eugene O’Neill disinherited his daughter Oona, accusing her of seeking publicity fit for a second-rate actress and “floozie”
— Barron Hilton, Paris Hilton’s grandfather, said last year that he would leave almost all his fortune to charity, costing Paris $2.2bn
Source: www.legalzoom.com; agencies
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think Anita Roddick was misguided. There is nothing obscene about leaving money to your offspring. I think rather it's obscene not to say selfish in the extreme to have made millions and enjoyed a very wealthy lifestyle only to leave not a penny of it to those you supposedly loved the most.
Simon, London, UK
A lot of people who work for charities are overpaid fat cats. Isn't it ironic then that Anita Roddick left her money to people just like her?
Simon, London, UK
michelle, berlin - how pathetic. So that £655,000 to the taxman, let alone annual business rates paid since the founding of the Body Shop, mean nothing? She has more than contributed to society, more than quite a lot of us have.
Anita Roddick has done what a small, but signficant proportion of wealthy parents have done - considered the future mental and social welfare of their children, and not just give give give as if money was purely an inconvenience to exchange goods with.
Not only does it make them appreciate how money is earnt, it also gives them purpose in life - to do their own thing, experience life in the rough end. That is life - to learn, make mistakes and go through hardship before enjoying the rewards. You ca't do that if you're already rich through inheritance.
The world's richest men are doing the same - Buffet, Bill Gates - leaving enough so their children can do something, but not enough so that they do nothing.
Jeff, Manchester,
A. Mason- Monetary inheritance is a bonus not a human right and should be treated as such.
You may be interested to know that in France it is a constitutional right. One cannot disinherit one's children. Or one's wife/husband. Specific percentages go to each. When I first moved here years ago I was constantly asked by French people what a will was- they had seen scenes in Dallas and similar US fim/TV programmes where there is a drama over the deceased's estate. They all throught that this was made up for dramatic effect because, obviously, it could not be legal to not provide for your family upon your death!
MonacoMum, Roquebrune Cap Martin, France
In response to Michelle, Berlin
The article clearly states that Anita's husband Gordon got a share of the £100 million from the sale of the company to L'Oreal.
So it is very possible that he will bequeath some of this fortune to the children.
I don't think we should worry too much about their financial situation in the future or about any burden they may be to the state.
Ten, Eastbourne, England
it is a different kind of greed and control. so she cut her kids out of her will so that the rest of british society may one day have to care for them (pensions, unemployment insurance, etc.).
michelle, berlin,
Monetary inheritance is a bonus not a human right and should be treated as such. Anita Roddick gave her children so much during her life, more than most since in addition to love and support, good education , comfortable home etc, she left them her Body Shop achievements, the will to challenge the status quo for her beliefs, making charitable donations a way of life and not just a good intention - the list is endless. The tone of the article seems to imply that Anita Roddick was some sort of uncaring mother for not leaving her offspring cash alone.
A Mason, London, UK