Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Have your say in the Alpha Mummy discussion
Last week’s announcement that the caesarean rate in Britain has now risen to one in four births, was met with predictable reactions. There was much gnashing of teeth from the midwife quarter, the inevitable mutterings about “too posh to push” and all those hairy-faced ladies from the National Childbirth Trust leapt up to blame the doctors for forcing women into unnatural childbirth. Honestly, these days you’d think the act of having a baby was political. How you choose to deliver your child seems to say more about you than your social class, income or choice of handbag.
You never hear it for caesareans. They are the underclass of childbirth options. Women who have caesareans are treated like failures, or soft, pain-dodging cop outs. Never mind that the latest rise in caesareans has actually been among emergency, not elective procedures, which means that these women will have tried very hard to give birth naturally, or that a caesarean is major abdominal surgery, leaving you incapacitated for weeks.
What is routinely ignored however, is that caesareans have saved more lives than almost any other surgical procedure in history. Natural childbirth is hugely complicated: the large brain of the baby human is required to pass through the tiny, fixed pelvis of its mother. Haemorraghing, infection and obstruction of labour are all frequent obstacles to safe birth and in the past, childbirth has been the biggest killer of women. Not any more. But unlike the pill, the vote or equal pay, or any of those breakthroughs which have given women control over their lives and their bodies, the caesarean is consistently denigrated.
My own story illustrates the point. Expecting my first child at the end of last October, I hopped right on to the natural childbirth wagon. Egged on by magazines, yoga classes, birthing “gurus” and all manner of new age propaganda, my preparation for the big event was all about my own personal female empowerment. I would travel to the astral portal of all feminine life, tripping on the beauty of my contractions, and see the meaning of life through the haze of my pain as I welcomed my baby to the world.
Such was my indoctrination that I believed the strongest painkiller I would need was my husband’s ability to hypnotise me. I wasn’t even allowed to use the word pain. Contractions? No — they’re surges, dear.
There’s nothing wrong with this approach, of course, plenty of women do manage to birth their children with comparative ease. But it is by no means true for all of us. I remember one friend telling me “the problem with childbirth is no one tells you how painful it is”, and she’s right. But then I thought, how difficult could it be if women the world over did it once, twice, even several times?
Aromatherapy candles at the ready, my due date came and went. As did the next two weeks, as I heaved my groaning body up and down Parliament Hill in north London in a bid to “bounce the baby down”. At one point two well-spoken women stopped me to palm a Buddhist chant they assured me would get the baby out. What is this collusion?
At my scan I begged the doctor not to set a date for my induction. Sympathetically he agreed as I was in good health, and I embarked on round after round of acupuncture, reflexology and any sort of hocus pocus that professed to bring on labour. I could have gone for a week’s stay in the Portland for the amount I spent on alternative treatments.
But by November 7 there was still no sign of movement so at 8.30am my husband and I turned up at hospital for the induction. Little did I know then that half of all inductions end in emergency caesareans, mainly because chemically induced labour is stronger, longer and harder and that pregnancies that need to be induced are generally problematic in the first place.
Contractions kicked in almost immediately, but they were irregular and mild. Six hours later another pessary was administered and this time the contractions came on astonishingly strong. Four hours later the pain, I knew, was more than I could bear, and I asked for a shot of diamorphine. But by about 10pm I was only 3cm dilated, still it was enough for them to break my waters in an attempt to coerce my body into doing what it was meant to be doing. No dice. The contractions continued, but the dilation was unbe-lievably slow. I realised I could no longer bear the pain unassisted, and I requested an epi-dural. Sorry, howled for one.
After four attempts to insert the needle into my spine, a consultant anaesthetist was sent for, who managed to get me to sit still long enough to get the needle in. The chief midwife was encouraging, reassuring me I would be able to get this baby out; the doctors supported her.
By morning I was still only 7cm dilated, so it was agreed I should go on an oxytocin drip to speed up the contractions. The dose was doubled, and then doubled again as I stalled at 9cm.
At this point, 30 hours after I had been admitted, the junior registrar raised the C-word. With the natural childbirth lobby ringing in my ears, I asked if I could speak alone to the chief midwife. She agreed with the doctor. Then the senior registrar appeared. Calmly, he laid out the situation. He made no attempt to coerce me into a caesarean and left the decision in my hands.
When I opted to double the oxytocin dose again in a last ditch attempt to get to 10cm, he went along with me, until the baby’s heart rate took a turn for the worse and we caved in to the operating theatre. Once they opened me up it became clear what had happened: my son’s head was wedged at an odd angle into my pelvis, meaning he had been unable to descend. To get him out, he had to be pushed back up, before he could be fished out of my abdomen.
Not a pleasant experience, I’ll grant you, but the fact remains that without a caesarean, both my son and I would be dead. In the last 50 years the emancipation of women has been aided by scientific breakthroughs that have allowed us to manage our bodies and our dual roles in society as mothers and individuals. The caesarean section is one such breakthrough, and it should be celebrated as such.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
No sane person with an average amount of grey matter could ever deny the frequent necessity for these ops; that being a given, as is oft. the case, the media's responsibility extolling the virtues of the much-loved-by-celebs (so you don't, heaven forbid, get a tummy) C-section, is largely to blame, for any negative picture, attritbuted to these serious medical interventions.
However, any mother/father/family-to-be who hasn't observed the numerous column inches on the govt. driven financial imperatives for the NHS to perform these ops. over the near-mythical 'natural' births, and so-called 'normal' births, is living in blissed-out-hormonal pregnancy bliss. Or at worst, they haven't done their basic research into how, mummies-to-be, give birth.If you're too busy working to attend ante-natal classes, can't access the web, or can't read, then talk to a few people you know who have given birth. There isn't a single person who will pretend that the process of giving birth is a simple choice
Anita, London,
There are those of us,loads I guess,who had a caesarean but not the healthy baby at the end of it,a severely brain damaged one,that the medics claim was already brain damaged, so no warmies that I got a healthy baby at the end of it,no compensation either,just for the record.
Heather, Bolton,
As a hairy faced woman I object to someone using that description as an insult. I suffer from Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and like many others with that condition struggle with the embarrassment and difficulties it causes , one main symptom being unwanted facial hair. Sometimes I get depressed & let it all hang out and don't depilate etc But it would be sooo nice if people didn't make judgements on superficial grounds all the time.
One of the reasons that caesarean birth is increasing is because mothers like myself were born by c-section in the 1960's due to large heads despite being destined to grow to be small in skeletal stature and to produce more babies with large heads.
Without c-section I would have died as would my mother - which would have reduced the c-sections stats so far by 7 which are myself, my siblings and child and my siblings' children - all with large heads and small mothers.
I like to think the world is a better place for our presence.
Michele, UK,
I would like to thank Tiffanie for writing this article.
My baby was due at the end of September, after going 10 days overdue I went into labour. Progress was very slow and 30 hours later (with the help of the oxytocin drip) I was fully dilated. After pushing for an hour with no sign of a baby the doctor was called. My baby was also wedged at an awkward angle and after a failed ventouse attempt, my daughter was delivered by emergency caesarean section.
The caesarean is not a pleasant experience and certainly not an "easy" option but I have recovered well and have a beautiful healthy daughter. I am well aware that without the caesarean, it is doubtful either of us would be here.
The article was a positive insight about this operation and stated the very clear fact that caeasareans save lives. Thank you Tiffanie
Rebecca Rawlinson, Preston,
As a mother of three children all born by c-section , the 1st and 3rd emergencies, and 2nd an elective, i too am thankful that we have the technology and medical knowledge that allows us to have safe surgical births. As an Antenatal Teacher for the NCT, and at the age of 26 having been part of the NCT for almost four years i don't have a hairy face. In previous years i was a model. The author of this artical was making a very insulting gesture to teachers, this is childish and inmature school yard tactics! In my classes we discuss what interventions may be offered and why. We also talk about the positives and negatives of what may happen if these interventions are accepted. As with every other teacher out there we discuss c-sections again talking about their positives and negatives. It is about making an informed choice based on the evedience based knowledge that they get by coming to classes. Maybe the author would like to observe a course? Your welcome at mine
Mrs Emma Jackson, Carterton, Oxfordshire, UK
I too had placenta praevia and when the diagnosis was made at about 32 weeks I had a moment of disappointment that I would not be able to give birth naturally. This was quickly replaced by a profound feeling of thanks that I was in a developed country, with access to all the technology that allowed me to give birth to my son and to be alive to tell the tale.
Barbara, Adelaide, Australia
After delivering two large children naturally I will have to undergo surgery for a prolapsed bladder in the future. As I will be older this surgery is more likely to fail and recovery will be more difficult. My bladder is now weak and no amout of pelvic floor exercises seems to help. Knowing the state of my body now I would have have opted for a C section. I do not understand the fuss over how a baby is delivered, as long as the baby is healthy, that should be all that matters. We seem to forget that before modern medicine and C sections women frequently died in childbirth.
Karen, Amsterdam, Netherlands
"Little did I know then that half of all inductions end in emergency caesareans, mainly because chemically induced labour is stronger, longer and harder"
Had Ms Darke actually attended NCT classes she would have been very well aware of this fact as medical help in labour is covered in a very balanced way. She would have also been given help in understanding and questioning whether induction was the best option for her.
My NCT classes teach about Caesarian section and point out that we are fortunate to have access to safe surgical birth for those women who need it. Unfortunately medical intervention such as induction may result in women having a section which would not have been necessary had they gone into labour spontaneously.
Please do not tar NCT with this brush - we are about choice and support for parents whatever their experience of birth. Putting women off in this way may be preventing them from accessing valuable support and information.
Jo Ball, Ulverston, Cumbria
Thank Goodness!! Finally an article representing the large number of us who have had to have sections through necessity rather than vanity. My first son was born after two days of labour,they tried everything to get him out. As I lay there exhausted and scared at 23 years old, crying as I signed the consent form, all that mattered was a safe delivery. It turns out I have a damaged coccyx and cannot give birth naturally. This was only discovered after a later x-ray. I have had two subsequent sections and can assure anyone who thinks its an easy way out that it most certainly isn't. I would love to have given birth naturally and have the most terrible 'skin pouch' where my stomach was ruined by three in five years. I can never wear a bikini or show my stomach in public. The only option is cosmetic surgery but I can't face being cut open again. There is a difference in women who choose a section for convenience over us whose children would be either dead or brain damaged.
Sarah Kelly, Bishops Stortford, UK
Both my daughters were born via C section thirty or so years ago. Things don't seem to have moved on since that time, as far as the stigma attached to the C word is concerned. I had a placenta praeva with both pregnancies, and would not be here to tell the tale, or have had my daughters, without caesareans.
Jan Laidlaw, Geelong, Australia
I agree wholeheartly. My son was also wedged at an awkward angle and his heart rate dipped alarmingly as I struggled on and on with labour. With surgical intervention we are both happy and healthy, without the outcome would have been disastrous. I see no downside and have never for one moment felt a failure, I just feel lucky.
jane, london , uk
I could have written this article myself! Even down to the dates: my son was due the end of last October and was born on the 7th November after a 36 hour labour. The only difference is I was lucky in that my labour culminated in a successful ventouse delivery. I too had naively planned for minimal pain relief and ended up desperate for an epidural. Had I required a caesarean I would have happily agreed. The truth is that each labour is different in duration and pain, and the stigma attached to the C-section is undeserved.
Hilary Smith, Egham, UK
I have never understood the fuss about natural childbirth - the ultimate aim is a healthy baby and a healthy mother. I too had to have a caesarean (after 2 days of labour) and have never felt a failure. I had no problems breast-feeding afterwards, and recovered far more quickly than another friend who insisted on a natural birth (and couldn't sit down without a cushion for 6 mths). People forget that many women and babies used to die in childbirth.
annie, glasgow,
Having experienced both a vaginal (natural doesn't come into it!) & a caesarean, I feel it is time that it was openly appreciated that having a caesarean is not a decision taken lightly by the majority of mothers. My first child was born after a protracted delivery. I ended up asking for an epidural as I was vomiting frequently and having attacks of the shakes - the epidural was an attempt to conserve my energy, everything slowed down, oxytocin drip, a big head that wasn't going anywhere and a ventouse later and our son was born. The aftereffects of the stitching left me with other problems which I didn't even mention to my midwife until was 34 weeks pregnant with my daughter. Suddenly the option of a c-section was raised, because there was concern that further damage might be very difficult to put right. I'm extremely glad she was born by c-section, I got over the birth far more quickly, and don't face the prospect of restorative surgery where the sun doesn't shine!
Lucy, Perth, Scotland
Hi, I am sorry that Tiffanie Darke has had such a birth experience. Also that she has felt the need to debrief in public. If she had attended NCT classes she would have been able to explore induction and the 'cascade of intervention', whereby one intervention in hospital can lead to another, and another, so she would have been better placed to make an informed decision about the alternatives of induction or a wait-and-see option, if the heatlh of her/her baby was not compromised at the time.
The NCT has many support groups for all parents, e.g for those who have had a caesarean birth or premature babies, plus an experience register which offers parents the opportunity to talk to others who have had experiences whether good or bad.
As far as being hairy-faced, as an NCT teacher I would never make any such judgements about my clients so it woudl be good if she could respect individuality and not make personal remarks, because it devalues the rest of her arguments.
Barb, Hampshore, UK
Tiffanie Darke obviously had a traumatic time giving birth and is using the article to debrief herexperience. Hopefully it will enable her to move on from
being angry with
those people whose job it is to encourage women to believe in their bodies and themselves. We are constantly hearing negative stories about birth in the press but at least 40 % of women have a straightforward birth, however, we never hear their birth stories, the ones in which they feel thrilled and empowered.
I am full of sympathy for Tiffanie Darke but it is certainly not midwives, the NCT or alternative practioners that are responsible for making women feel guilty for having had a caesarean - I can only conclude that it must be the press!
anne Haworth, london, UK