Stefanie Marsh
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Here comes a book, from a progressive corner of the United States (Brooklyn, New York), that tells us that a single lesbian has had a baby with an anonymous sperm donor. About which many British people would privately think, so what? It happens here all the time, even if many don’t like it. Only last month we read about Andy Bathie, a 37-year-old fire-fighter, who donated sperm to a lesbian couple five years ago and is now being made to pay child support because the couple separated.
But Louise Sloan’s book has irritated people, even here. Her own story – single lesbian conceives child via anonymous sperm donor – is sufficiently unconventional to make the social conservatives wrinkle their noses. And even some liberals are unsettled by the contents of Sloan’s book. A jaunty part-memoir, Knock Yourself Up – “a tell-all guide to becoming a single mom” – is provocatively subtitled, No Man? No Problem!Alongside her own experiences, she has interlaced the stories of more than 50 single mothers – most straight, all “the new breed of single moms”.
The tone is flip and matter of fact and occasionally gynaecological. We find out that some women masturbate while inseminating themselves with turkey basters because they are more likely to conceive. Others light candles and play soft music. Nicole loves it “when my inseminations are on a Saturday. I read the paper, and then go out for breakfast. Last time I scheduled a pedicure for afterwards. Married couples have fun making a baby – why shouldn’t I?”
Carol found prince charming in a sperm bank: “He’s stellar in the sciences, whereas I’m a more liberal arts person. We’ve got a complete overlap of hobbies. He’s tall and slim – with dimples! And even, straight teeth without braces! He’s a great addition to the family tree.” When Jenny first saw a picture of her sperm donor on the web she thought: “Oh my God, I would totally have sex with that guy.”
Eva tells Sloan: “There’s a reason I’m single – relationships involve a lot of compromise and I want to keep my voice,” but never suspects that she comes across as an unbearable control freak. Kimberley complains that: “I am a magnet for alcoholic crazy lunatics,” but doesn’t ask herself why. Sloan writes that women are beginning to see their lives in a different order: children, then, if you’re lucky, a partner. But “for most single mothers by choice whose libidos remain intact,” writes Sloan, “looking for love or sex becomes logistically or emotionally complicated. The solution? A vibrator.”
Sloan is a graduate of Brown University (comparative literature), then glossy magazines such as Glamour and Golf for Women, no Andrea Dworkin is she. Her career high before the publication of Knock Yourself Up was the award for a piece she wrote for a woman’s magazine on coming out as a lesbian at work. It’s what I’d call “celebratory” journalism, factual and yet gloopily soulful and upbeat, atmospherically much like an organic food shop – at least half the women she interviews are either “energetic and attractive”, or “strikingly attractive”, their children are frequently “adorable”.
Before I read the book I had hoped to meet a firebrand proponent of the “choice motherhood movement”. But Sloan is disappointingly meek and likeable, a little stunned that her research has prompted such an outcry, a little vague on the impact that “choice motherhood” will have on society. She opens the door to her medium-sized Brooklyn apartment in jeans and no make-up. She looks a lot less exhausted than some married mothers I know.
Sloan makes tea while her two-year-old son, Scott, is bustled off for a walk by the nanny. “I was not one of these, ‘oops I forgot to have a baby’ people,” Sloan says’ “I was a romantic procrastinating idiot.” At 19, she came out and, by the time she reached her mid-twenties, had settled down in a stable relationship. At 28, she was ready to have children, but her partner put off having them. After eight years, they split up. “Women don’t understand the concept of a time limit. I think some in their forties haven’t got to grips with that. There’s a kind of wilful denial, which is what I was engaged in. I didn’t anticipate that relationship to end,” she says. “I certainly ended up paying for my arrogance.”
Scott was conceived two days before Sloan’s 42nd birthday – it was her 13th attempt at pregnancy. She had tried to inseminate herself with sperm from a donor eight times and there are vivid descriptions of her disappearing up the stairs at her Republican mother’s house with a Fed-Ex parcel to go to her room and “baste” (from “turkey baster”). Scott was conceived in stirrups in a doctor’s surgery. His father is a tall, handsome, green-eyed actor (“Favourite colour: blue. Favourite pets: dogs”). Twelve vials of green eyes’ semen are still sitting refrigerated in liquid nitrogen. What does she intend to do with them? “There are women who would probably want to buy it from me. I’ve discussed the idea with a lesbian couple who are trying for a child. I think it’s a nice idea for the children to know they have siblings elsewhere. It’s probably not legal to actually sell it.”
What upset her critics most is Sloan’s take-’em-or-leave-’em stance on men, this despite the death of her own father when she was a child, an experience she describes as: “Difficult. When I saw bonding experiences between fathers and their children it felt very sad.”
In her introduction, she writes: “We single mothers by choice have children – or are thinking about having them – because we believe that we have a lot to offer as moms. About the only thing we didn’t have to offer our kids was a guy named Dad.” Farther down the page she continues: “Most of the women in this book would love to find the right guy but, when push came to shove, decided that finding a husband just wasn’t their No 1 priority. Having a child was.” Sloan quotes Kimberley, who chose an anonymous donor: ‘“I don’t know anything about this person. I don’t want my child to have a false sense of connection.” Kimberley doesn’t fret too much about how her child will feel if, as an adult, he or she will be denied access to information about their father: “That can be sad and I’ll never know what it is like for them – but everybody has something they are sad about at some point.”
Having grown up without a father, Sloan was initially wary of bringing another fatherless child into the world. “I spent a lot of time thinking about it. When I think of my own father, he is the best father in the world and probably a fantasy person who never existed.” But she was reassured when she talked to the adult children of sperm donors: “It is hard for me to understand how it cannot be a huge issue, but they don’t seem curious. Most don’t seem to have even that much interest in their fathers. They don’t feel that this is a crushing issue in their lives. I hope that’s true for Scott.” Sloan talks about “coming out” as a single mother by choice, a process that she found infinitely less awkward than coming out as a lesbian. To her face, most people have been perfectly nice, especially, she says, married parents: “They can understand what it’s like wanting a child.” The most pointed hostility comes from childless women her age who, she thinks, may “feel threatened and angry. It’s bursting the bubble. It’s, ‘how dare you contradict my vision’.” Samantha, one of Sloan’s interviewees, suspects that she was cut off by a close friend after she decided to have a child because “it’s something she wouldn’t feel comfortable doing, and she’s envious”.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
No one NEEDS a child. A child is not a necessity for life. One will not DIE without a child.
These people WANT. From what my parents, and the Rolling Stones, taught me...you don't always get what you WANT. Grow up and deal with it. It is the height of selfishness to make another HUMAN BEING simply because you WANT a baby to dress up, show off and be your best friend at this point in time.
Heidi, Madison, WI/USA
This book is not from a "progressive corner" of the US. It's just our liberal media promoting its immoral agenda. "Everybody has something to be sad about"? Sloan is going to make sure of it. She is selfish as her insecure wants outweighed the need of a son, during his LIFE, to have a father (obviously what nature intended), to show him how to act, restrain himself, and be a gentleman. If his mother can't control him during his formative years - they often can't - then he may join a gang as a substitute (for LA gangs, over 80% of the kids don't have fathers). What if Sloan has a girl? She will never know why a man is important, what a man is, or how to relate to one. The middle aged women who she thinks were angry? Probably rightous scorn for her selfish choice. And it is usually not a "selfish choice" to have a child when you're married. It's nature: a near unstoppable drive, between men and women, to continue life. Apologies from the US. Tom, Santa Barbara
Tom, Santa Barbara, CA
Defenders of this sort of vile selfishness are utterly misguided to ask the question:
'Is the woman who carefully plans her pregnancy really morally inferior to the woman who conceives by the man she met at a party three weeks ago? Or the woman who stays in a bad relationship because she desperately wants children?'
I for one have never said that a woman in either of the above situations is morally superior to a single woman who users a donor: you are all on the same level of selfishness, and are all as despicable as each other. You show a complete disregard for the child's well-being, devaluing in one-fell-swoop the role of the father in the upbringing of a child, and putting your selfish desire to 'have a baby' over and above everything else.
How can you genuinely claim to provide a stable home when the child has been conceived amidst such appalling selfishness?
Nick, London,
Children need their mum and dad, kids are brought up better in a stable home with both parents.There are plenty of good single mums in the same way there are bad parents but being a single parent should not be a matter of lifestyle choice. It's selfish and I'm sorry to say this in our age of moral relativism but it is simply wrong. Most people in jail in this country - mostly men - came from single parent or broken homes. They are united by one thing - a deprived upbringing where many of them never had a father to keep them on the rails, love them and provide them with a role model. Society's problems start in the home. For our social problems look no further than the breakdown of the traditional family.
Andy, Suffolk,
One more nail in the coffin of the male of the species! It seems that some have become delusional to the point where they think that having children is a lifestyle choice - whether it is 60+ yr olds or lesbians. The interests of the child are clearly ignored. However, that aside, one specific point irks me - i respect and defend everyone's right to enter into a relationship of their choosing, but if you enter a homosexual relationship, surely one of the obvious choices you make is that you cannot have children?
Vaseem Akbar, London, UK
It's amazing that it's considered acceptable to condem a loving, solvent, intelligent, articulate woman for having a child. Of course in an ideal world a child should have two well ballanced, loving parents that are able to provide. This world isn't ideal. Surely our concern for children should be directed towards those who suffer due to abussive or neglectful parenting. But those cases don't titilate in the same way, do they?
Sarah, London,
It's utter selfishness of course. But nothing I don't expect. Pity the poor children, but proponents of this approach don't really care about that do they? More important to make a (socio)political point...
Phibes, London, England
Why has the author neglected to ask the most obvious question; given that there is a wealth of evidence that growing-up in a single-parent family is bad for children, why go ahead with this?
Growing up in a single parent family increases the risk of unemployment, poor physical and mental health and many other indices.
This omission is the single most revealing thing about this article.
B Grant, London,
I feel sadness for the loss of a father for this child. The trite argument that "there are many 2 parent families that are dysfunctional" doesnt convince that the ideal is not a 2 parent family. My son feeds off his mummy & daddy in ways that no aunt, uncle, friend, brother or other can replace. Wilson has it so right. The me culture is madness. Another nail in the coffin for humanity.
fiona agnew, Buenos Aires,
I don't quite understand. "Sloan makes tea while her two-year-old son, Scott, is bustled off for a walk by the nanny.".
She wanted to bring up a child then hires someone else to do it? Perhaps she needs to learn to love someone other than herself before being a mother.
Paul, Newport, UK
Here in the UK we have hundreds of thousands of uneducated young girls whose' career' aim is getting pregnant. Single motherhood is actively encouraged by the Government in that Bottler Brown has made benefits so generous, to the detriment of financial help for pensioners and the disabled. These adolescents are required to work a mere 16.20hrs a week in order to qualify for housing benefit, free dentistry and Family Tax credit etc while individuals in their 50's 60's and even 70's are working long hours to survive. The taxes of those working has soared to pay for this. The children of these 'girls' will in all probability do likewise in that the fathers are either in their lives fleetingly or not at all. While anonymous sperm donors are not ideal, at least these children seem to be born to educated women with careers and will undoubtedly be better role models for their children than these children of young single mothers in the UK.
sophie, london,
Hey, it's her business. If a single woman, who will soon be reaching the age where she can no longer become pregnant, wants a baby and can afford a child, then, let her have one of her own. It will at least be a son or daughter who is loved and wanted. That's more than can be said for many children born in this world. I do not think that the people condemning these women are truly concerned about these children. They are only obsessed with their own phony "supposed" morality and prejudice. If they were really concerned for children, they would be doing more to make this world a better place for all of them, and for their families, be they families headed by one parent or two. - RCS
R C S, Oakton , Virginia, USA
Personally, let the ladies baste themselves away. However, the idea of then requiring the sperm donor to provide child support when their lesbian heaven is upset is odious.
Sleeper, Houston, TX, USA
Our system means that in this country you would be taxed - thus having your life chances reduced - to subsidise this woman's choice.
Mike , Midsomer Norton, UK
Total madness. Me me me at all costs. No thank you.
Wilson, London, UK
"No. Do not worry about the child, it is YOU that is important."
What is wrong with us?
Jebus...whoever...help us!!!
M, Milwaukee, USA
Not having a father is a serious issue, it can ruin people's lives as many men and women will attest. It shouldn't be turned into the latest fashion craze for women who don't have/want a husband.
Chris Dela, Cambridge,