Download your 2 for 1 Pizza Express voucher

According to Kate Winslet her eight-year-old daughter has fixed views about her mother's wardrobe. Welcome to my world Kate. And every other mother-with-daughter's universe. When it comes to their mother's appearance, all daughters have views, ranging in ferocity from mildly scathing to fathomless reservoirs of scorn. That surely is the point of them. When they're not mewling, wingeing or bitching (depending what point of the evolutionary trajectory they're on), isn't their main function to set their mothers straight sartorially?
No one dispenses advice on looks the way that daughters do. Sometimes they don't even need to say anything. The look of fear on your five-year-old's face when you get togged up one night in your on-trend puffball skirt, the discovery that your ten-year-old has been lying to you about parents' evening for the past two terms on the basis that if she told you that the school had dispensed with them, you wouldn't be able to humiliate her by turning up in your ancient granny coat and hopelessly off-trend trainers - these tell you all you need to know about your style.
I think we'd be foolish not to listen sometimes. I don't mean we should heed the stuff from five-year-olds about how they'd want us to dress like Barbie, or adopt Cheryl Cole's hairdresser. But children can be remarkably perceptive about appearances and fearless, if not entirely precise, when it comes to expressing their reservations. “Mummy, why are you wearing clown make-up?” may lack the sophistication of a Vogue analysis, but it does the job. Last week Kate, 33, told a US chatshow: “[Mia]said: ‘Mum, why do you wear so much black?'”And she's right, her mother does wear too much back.
Once I'd explained to my daughters why I would not be wearing miniskirts, ever (horrible knees) , or orange, they learnt to frame their comments within a context that was relevant to my style and wasn't simply a projection of their fantasies. If you teach them generally that spiteful remarks are unhelpful (and have a way of coming back to bite you), you can work your way towards a mutually helpful clothes-us operandi that can be a tremendous source of pleasure. The night my daughters laid out an outfit on the bed for me to wear to a party - navy silk dress, black satin shoes, matching bag and underwear - was the moment I realised that, sartorially speaking, they'd grown up. I think the eldest was about 10.
They're now 16 and 13. I often ask - and sometimes take - their counsel and try not to proffer my advice unless asked for, except when they insist on flashing dazzling amounts of cleavage, which they all seem to, or going out into a snowdrift without coats. Terrified of shunting them into an eating disorder, I initially banned myself from saying “Have you seen the size of your bottom in that?” but I have become more forthright recently, particularly with the trend for metallic neon leggings and the not entirely felicitous effect they have on the family's legs unless worn with long tops.
I'm gratified to say that most days they pop into my bedroom before leaving for school to get the once over, although whether it's me, or my job as the Times Fashion Editor, the trappings of which carry far more kudos among them and their friends than the papacy, that impresses them is a moot point.
I'm equally happy to report that while fashion may be one area of our co-existence in which all is pretty harmonious (choose your battles: your 15-year-old's habit of applying her make-up as if she were starring in La Cage aux Folles isn't that big a deal) ,we don't share clothes. I have no desire to relive my teens in aforementioned American Retro leggings, even while I love the way that they look on them (provided long tops are worn). Meanwhile, my clothes are far too frumpy (and, being generally knee length, about 20cm too long) for them. However, they covet my handbags and shoes, although alas (can you sense my utter jubilation?) their feet are much bigger than mine. For the purposes of this piece, I asked them how they would like me to dress in an ideal world. All things considered, they conceded, they wouldn't change anything. That, for me, beats being on any best-dressed list.
You've let yourself go
It is my five-year-old daughter's oft-expressed opinion that most of my clothes are “uggerly”. When she sits on the floor in changing rooms watching me try on yet another dark brown, long-sleeved top (my preferred dowdy weed of winter) her expression is one of saddened incomprehension. “There are loads of pretty dresses in this shop - why do you want to look like a boy?” she asks, shaking her head, the way a disappointed teacher does. “Brown's horrible and grungy, like poo. And it reminds me of black and I don't like black because that reminds me of the scary dark.” Right-ho.
It's no use explaining, as I have many times, that as mummies get older they can't go to work in February wearing cerise taffeta because then they'll look like desperate panto dames (or, actually, King's Cross hookers). Children of her age just don't agree with the premise. If you are an aged crone - ie, over 25 - then that's all the more reason to wear bright colours - “just like the three good fairies in Sleeping Beauty - and they're even older than you”. Unlike Kate Winslet's daughter - who told her mother that “anyone over the age of 10 shouldn't wear pink” - she thinks the world would be a better place if all females dressed permanently like Tinkerbell.
So I knew which outfits Lucy would pick when I let her loose on my wardrobe. Like a dervish, she made a beeline for the main monstrosity, a long, salmon-pink evening dress from Karen Millen, which I bought in a moment of blind derangement and makes me look like a thick-waisted prawn (I've worn it once). Then, as predicted, she pulled out my wedding dress, a cream Alice Temperley job, in which Lucy watched me get married to her father two and a half years ago. At the time she seemed astonished that I'd scrubbed up OK and, probably because I was wearing a tiara, said “Mummy, you're like a princess”. Bless her. But she cannot understand why I haven't worn it since: I know she thinks I have “let myself go”. If it was up to her I'd be trotting off to Tesco in it every week.
Her third choice was more surprising - a multicoloured sundress from H&M that finally even she, in her sweet, rose-tinted specs, could see was grotesquely
unflattering. So after much umming it was the frightful prawn with 4in heels (again, never worn). I pointed out that the temperature was freezing and that it had no sleeves but Lucy scorned my wussiness. The pièce de résistance was a silk flower in my hair and a garland of plastic flowers from her hula-girl outfit.
I appear, as you can see, like an escaped psychiatric patient. But Lucy says I look “much better than usual” and, alarmingly, her father doesn't disagree. “You hardly ever wear nice dresses, always tatty old jeans and stuff,” shrugs my own Gok Wan.
Well, that's because dresses are uncomfortable and impractical and you have to wear nasty tights and it has been, like, minus 5C lately, I say defensively. If we let children dress us everyday we'd all die of hypothermia. And anyway you try going to the shop on a rainy Monday afternoon in a jewel-encrusted long frock.
My local newsagent was very polite and asked whether I was going “somewhere
nice”. But the other customers, I knew, were simply wondering whether I'd
forgotten to take my medication.
Carol Midgley
Now you're a lady
A few weeks before this assignment, and I'm getting ready to go out for the evening. My daughter Beatrice, 5, wanders in. She is wearing a pair of yellow candystripe shorts, school socks, red Wellington boots and an acid-green fleece with pink and blue polkadots on it. This is her idea of suitable nightwear. I have reluctantly acquiesced, not least because I just want her to go to bed so I can make an attempt to look decent.
She puts down her toy dog, Toby, and observes me. “The problem is, Mummy,” she says, “that you look quite nice - but you'll never be pretty until you grow your hair.” She is almost certainly correct, of course. Nevertheless, it's not a helpful observation at this stage. “Also,” she continues, “you should wear a skirt more often. Trousers are for boys. You already look like a boy because of your short hair. So, it wouldn't be nearly as bad if you put on a skirt. And some lipstick.” In the end I wear what I always wear on these occasions (a barmaidy black dress that makes me look only slightly less unattractive than Pat Butcher), and resolve to make up for my sartorial shortcomings with personality.
I long since gave up trying to draw attention to myself via clothing. I just want to play it safe. My daughter, of course, has none of my hang-ups. After passing through the obligatory pink phase at 3, she has settled into her own funky little style - and is assertive about it. On a recent trip to Jigsaw to find a bridesmaid's dress, she told the sales assistant that she was “actually allergic” to skirts, and could wear only shorts or skinny jeans , for medical reasons. On the way home, she elaborated: she was now officially a tomboy, and her new favourite colours were brown and red. All good signs given this challenge , I thought, as I told her that she was going to be in charge of my clothes for a day. Her eyes widened in disbelief. Then she giggled and said, “OK, OK, I know: you can wear just PANTS!” Her brother, 4, almost fell off his chair laughing. “Daddy's pants!” she added.
We went upstairs to the bedroom. Her first selection, a red High School Musical ra-ra skirt, was impractical. I agreed to her choice of accessory: a leopard-print handbag with silver leather handles. She rummaged through my wardrobe. Jeans, trousers, shirts - all rejected. She had something specific in mind...Eventually, she found what she was after: the dress. She fished out a red shawl, a pair of brown tights and my brown boots. “There,” she said. “Now you look like a proper lady.”
So I spent Saturday in my cocktail frock. I cleaned the bathroom, sorted the
washing, went to Sainsbury's - in layers of chiffon. Yes, I had to tuck the
frills into my bra while cleaning the bath, and I got the odd funny look in
the supermarket - but no one batted an eyelid. Someone even said that I
looked “quite nice”. Beatrice may have found her calling.
Sarah Vine
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Get ready for the winter sports season, with our resort guides and snow reports
We are backing British business, what is the confidence of the nation and what businesses are succeeding?
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2006/06
£POA
Surrey
2009
£114,950
Derbyshire
The best policy at the
best price
Be Wiser Insurance
£POA
Surrey
Highly competitive six figure
Nationwide
Swindon
Competitive benefits package
Chartered Institute of Builders
Ascot
Competitive salary + benefits
NHS Direct
London
£125K
Meltwater News
Nationwide Positions
With Part Exchange Crest Nicholson could get you moving.
Award-winning riverside development, SW11.
Luxury apartments for sale from £350,000.
Find out more about our luxurious apartments and houses for sale in the heart of Sussex.
for sale in the French Alps
from E189,000.
We're offering extra savings on Voyager & Adventure of the seas Mediterranean Cruises fr £549.
Book by 28 Feb!
Includes 3* accommodation throughout, a 15 minute Apollo night helicopter flight down the Las Vegas strip and United Airlines flights from Heathrow.
Same break by air costs £189. Valid for weekend travel until 31 Aug 10.
Get covered on your travels with a superb range of policies at great prices
Visit InsureandGo.com
Family friendly villas with Quality Villas. Book with the specialists.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Milkround
Copyright 2010 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.