Roland White
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
You can come out from behind the sofa now. There is no longer any need to hide from drunks, murderers, or even the prospect of a stiff lecture about your carbon footprint. Because I bring unexpected good news: things are not quite as terrible in Britain as we have feared.
The Economist has just published its Pocket World in Figures, the magazine’s annual snapshot of the world in statistics. If you have been waiting agog to learn which country produces the most natural and synthetic rubber, I can at last put you out of your misery. Well done, Thailand. It also reveals that the most dangerous roads are in Qatar, while Norway is a beacon of sexual equality to the rest of the world.
What about Britain? Once we were the indisputable top nation. So where are we now in the league of nations – mighty Manchester United or plucky Accrington Stanley?
No figures have yet been compiled to assess which country has the most gloomy, pessimistic people, but the British would surely be up there in, say, the top one. We believe ourselves to be drunk, sexually feckless and careless of our carbon footprint.
Yet according to The Economist, none of this is true. Or rather, it might well be true but other countries are much drunker and more sexually feckless.
Let’s start, though, with the bad news. Although we are the world’s fifth largest economy (behind the United States, Japan, Germany and China) our success does not appear to be making us very happy.
All that wealth we’re generating has to be spread around a relatively large population. So when living standards are measured – on gross domestic product per head – we slip to 16th behind nations such as Norway, Ireland, Sweden, Andorra and Finland. And we slip one place further on our quality of life. Norway is apparently the best place in the world to live, followed by Iceland and Australia. Even the Belgians are better off than the British under this United Nations rating that measures factors such as income, adult literacy and life expectancy.
Our high cost of living can’t help our feeling of wellbeing. Only the Norwegians, French and Danes find life more expensive. Our office space is particularly costly: of the top 20 most expensive places to rent an office, eight are in the UK.
In fact, London’s West End and City fill two of the top three places in the league table of expensive office space. Despite this drawback, we punch well above our weight when it comes to the economy. We attract more inward investment than any other country (it’s even rumoured that some of this $164,530m is not spent on Premier League football clubs) and we are bigger exporters than China.
Yet in other respects we are very much a mid-table nation. We are 18th for business innovation, 15th for information technology, 16th for gender equality, 20th for global competitiveness, but 10th when countries are ranked by business environment (Denmark is top, but if you’re thinking of moving there you should know that its house prices went up by 23% last year – the world’s biggest increase).
Let’s look on the bright side. We are much greener, more generous, more sober and more careful about sex than our reputation might suggest.
If, for example, you are a woman who is aged between 15 and 49 and either married or in a steady relationship, then you are a world leader in contraception. Just over 80% of women in the UK use “modern methods” of contraception (which covers pretty much everything except the rhythm method and crossing your fingers). Only Chinese women are more enthusiastic.
And despite evidence that is readily available in any of our towns or cities on Friday or Saturday night, we don’t appear to be all that keen on alcohol. We rank a mere 18th on general drink sales – way behind Australia, the clear leaders in this field – and 12th on wine sales. For beer, we don’t even make the top 20.
What are we doing with all that money we’re not spending on beer? We’re giving it to the poor and needy, that’s what. Although we are the fifth largest economy, we are the third biggest aid donor.
The government gives away more than £10,700m each year in foreign aid – that’s about £180 each. Only the United States and Japan give more, and possibly China, which doesn’t like to talk about its charity work and so doesn’t feature in the table.
We are also setting a good example to the world when it comes to green issues. Despite our economic success, we’re not even in the top 20 consumers of energy. Kuwait leads the list of shame, followed by the United Arab Emirates (it must be all that air conditioning). The French, Americans, Canadians and Belgians are all more profligate than we are. Even the careful Swedes and Norwegians use more energy per head than the UK.
Our greenish credentials are boosted by our relatively low ranking when it comes to carbon dioxide emissions per person. We are 23rd – better than Norway, Finland and Denmark and much better than Australia.
The Pocket Guide also reveals why our armed forces are looking so stretched at the moment: they are tiny in comparison with other nations. The defence secretary, who commands the world’s fourth largest defence budget, has just 191,000 regulars and 199,000 reservists at his disposal, putting us in 26th place. France, Italy, Syria and even Morocco have larger forces.
If The Economist contains surprises about Britain, it’s nothing compared with the shocks provided by the Top Ten of Everything 2008, which will be published by Hamlyn later this month. For a start, this book overturns two long-held beliefs that are central to the British psyche: that we are the world’s greatest pet lovers and that it’s always raining.
Both wrong, I’m afraid. The Germans, French and Italians all own more pets than the British – we’re ranked just ninth. And we don’t even make the top 10 when it comes to rainy days. The world’s wettest place is somewhere usually associated with sunshine – Hawaii, where Mount Waialeale suffers 335 days of rain a year. And once you know that it’s comparatively sunny in Britain, life suddenly doesn’t seem so bad.
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Well said Ben,I get tired of the right wing running down Britain..for not being deferential,abstinent or snobbish.The simple conclusion is that more community ,more care and more fairness create a healthier society,while societies set up to feed the bottomless greed of the rich..don't work...good for social democratcs, depressing for the Daily Mail.In fact those intent on convincing us that modern Britain is a hellish playground,run by knife wielding,crack addicted chavs will be in an angry tailspin upon reading this research.Thatcher did change our values for the worse,and promoted bullying,selfishness and inherited privilege..but we are in recovery...though very slowly.
Rob, Plymouth, uk
"Despite our economic success, weâre not even in the top 20 c onsumers of energy" - But France has nuclear, Sweeden/Norway have a harsher climate and far more HydoElectric power. So they are greener than us in that respect.
Terry, London,
Rosemary,
Been at a Schoolies' weekend recently? Or on a trip to the Gold Coast?
Dectora, London, UK
Ben Parish and your "gap between the rish and poor".
Are you one of the (apparently) few hitting the bottle here ?
Mike T, Haslemere,
Ranking is all very well and good, but what about the variances?
Matt, Guildford,
Hey Rosemary
If it is per capita consumption that counts and Australia buys more drink that the UK, but has a smaller population, how come we have a smaller per capita consumption ?. What have we been doing with all that alcohol? I would be very disappointed to hear we have been pouring it down the drain
tony, Sydney, Australia
The OECD reports are wildly different from those quoted here and attributed to The Economist. The OECD talks about ethanol ingestion. The UK is 9th at 11.2 litres per capita, Australia 14th at 9.8 litres. Look it up. The Economist is still worried about the costs of Big Macs in each country as a way of measuring standard of living and has a unique way of looking at everything, I find.
Wendell MacAlistair, Peterborough, NH USA
"The British Army had a reported strength of 102,440 in 2005" - I believe this has shrunk below the 100,000 mark now. I'd say some of the statistics in this report are a little questionable.
Tom, Derby, England
"No figures have yet been compiled to assess which country has the most gloomy, pessimistic people, but the British would surely be up there in, say, the top one. We believe ourselves to be drunk, sexually feckless and careless of our carbon footprint."
When you say 'we' Roland White, I'm assuming you mean journalists. Take a few newspapers out of the equation and I think you'd find most Brits are a fairly positive, optimistic bunch.
Rod Munch, Northampton, UK
Almost £11 Billion in overseas aid? I wonder why, when the NHS can not dispense life-saving drugs and procedures in order to keep within fixed budgets, district hospitals are being closed for the same reason, the police force is losing control of the streets because of budget cuts, fire services are dual-crewing vehicles through a lack of manpower, etc etc, no one has ever queried this. I suppose we need to be demonstrating that we are still a world power or perhaps it would be politically incorrect to point out that the UK has people living in poverty - but don't I recall something about Charity beginning at home?
David Carver-Trotter, Plymouth, United (?) Kingdom
It has been said that there are three lies: lies, damn lies and statistics. I rest my case.
oladeji N. Gabisi, Smiths, Bermuda
I think Mr Reader should look at Wikipedia or the Financial Times. Australia's economy is dominated by the services sector at 68 percent of the economy - the same ratio as Canada's. Britain's figure is 73 percent. Both Australia and Canada are benefiting from the resources boom, as the recent deals at the APEC summit clearly show and this will continue and increase well into the future now that China has surpassed Japan as our main trading partner.
Paul Oscar, Sydney, Australia
So we spend 10,700mio pounds funding civil wars and corrupt dictators overseas while we spend 37 pence per day on our children's school meals; our hopitals are riddled with MRSA; our public education system is failing and the London Undergound is in decay.
Must make you glad to pay your taxes.
Paul, Singapore,
I don't understand Rosemary's coment. I can't see the alcohol consumption metrics, but the cigarette one is in terms aof consumption per head - so it woudl be reasonabe to assume that the quoted figures are per capita.
Anyway, even if it's volume - Australia has a smaller population than the UK so if it consumes more volume then the per capita must be larger (much larger) too.
It's perhaps also worthwhile noticing that Australia, a favoured destination for many emigrant Brits, has a current account deficit much larger as a proportion of GDP than the UK. Since Australia has no really significant service economy and has been enjoying the benefits of high raw material prices, the outlook is not that good.
Eddie Reader, birmingham, uk
I would count sexually feckless as promiscuous with abandon not the contraceptive usage percentage. There is also of course be the question of social desirability in the questioning... who is really going to admit to going out and getting drunk on a regular basis and being sloppy with the contraception?
Russell, Leeds,
Sorry to spoil a few stereotypes but.....
It's not comparable 'drink sales' that is relevant, it's the quantity drunk per capita
Repeated surveys indicate that Northern European countries - UK included - have higher levels of per capita consumption compared to Southern Europe
Australia, along with Canada NZ and the US, has nowhere near the per capita consumption of the UK, and hasn't had for 30 years. It's not even in the 'top 20' nations
What is common to Western cultures is a youth drinking culture, often to excess. It seems that in other countries adults grow out of this, but not in Northern Europe
rosemary, sydney, australia
Since the Thatcher era, the UK is in a downward state of decline. Not since the 1930's has there been such a gap between the rish and poor as part of a deliberate agenda. The countries at the top of the table are there for a good reason - there citizens don't have to worry about being spat, knifed or shot by teenagers when they are challenged - they nuture their children in families rather than badly nourished feral products of absent parents on impoverished council estates. They don't use their police forces to protect corporate interests - they are used for crime prevention. They provide their citizens with a clean environment and good healthcare, recycling facilities and sustainable products and energy. They allow immigration in a sustainable way so as not to instigate poverty wages as more people compete for badly paid jobs. They spend their GDP on improving their country rather than military hardware and meddling in other countries. I'll be reluctantly leaving the UK ASAP.
Ben Parish, London, Kent
Cor, I must hang out with the wrong Brits.
starling, Lancaster,