Times Online
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Will you have an eco-town in your back yard? Use the comment form below to give us your views
The Government came under fire from conservationists, country-dwellers and the Conservatives today after unveiling the shortlist for a series of "eco-towns" to be built across England.
The top 15 bids for the low-carbon, environmentally-friendly towns includes up to 15,000 homes at a controversial site in Leicestershire and settlements planned for former Ministry of Defence sites and disused airfields.
But other proposals which sparked protests, including one planned for Grovewood, Derbyshire, have been rejected by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), which chose from more than 50 candidates.
The full shortlist (see below) will be whittled down to up to 10 towns, which will finally get the go-ahead.
The Government said the eco-towns project aimed to tackle the twin issues of climate change and affordable housing, with the successful proposals having to supply between 30 per cent and 50 per cent affordable homes.
The settlements of between 5,000 and 20,000 homes, none of which are to be sited on green belt land, will have to be zero-carbon as a whole and be an “exemplar” in at least one area of environmental sustainability.
But the eco-towns have been controversial since proposals for sites around the country began to emerge last year.
Campaigners reacted angrily to today's inclusion of proposals for up to 6,000 homes on a former Royal Engineers depot south west of Stratford-upon-Avon.
The Middle Quinton site, also known as Long Marston, has poor transport links, no need of housing or regeneration and will spoil the surrounding area, the Bard Campaign against the eco-town said.
Izzi Seccombe, a Warwickshire county councillor, said: “Building 6,000 new homes at Long Marston is utterly inappropriate. It would put unsustainable pressure on Stratford’s transport infrastructure and local services.”
The shortlist includes a potential 15,000 home eco-town in Weston-on-the-Green, near Oxford, where Tim Henman’s parents have lived for 40 years and where he grew up. The tennis star has backed their protests against the siting of the Weston Otmoor eco-town on their doorstep.
Find your perfect energy efficient house
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Better idea: Make a list of brownfield sites, arrange it in descending order of local housing needs, build accordingly. Skip the anti-car regulations and concentrate on reducing the need for cars.
Michael, Pueblo, Colorado, US
Of course all new homes should be built to meet the strictest eco- standards. The eco spin needs to be separated from the new town proposals - they are quite different arguments. It is time the country was no longer run to provide economic growth by mass institutionalised consumerism. We are concreting over the South of England to provide industrial estates and homes for an economy largely for the benefit of the super rich. Time to focus on creating a sustainable lifestyle for everyone, protecting our environment not building on even more of it. We need an eco-economy, not "eco-towns".
Derek, Weston on the Green, UK
All we ever hear are these negative opinions. None of the moaners ever suggest a solution to what is undoubtably a huge problem of carbon emissions from standard houses, coupled with a growing need for houses. At least a green solution is being considered.
What should be discussed is how to make these eco towns work. Yes maybe there will be pressure on the wildlife and it will have to adapt, as it has done before - but this is surely a better option than the global disaster and complete destruction of habitat that is the projected outcome of our current rate of global warming?
Suggest better sights if there is a problem, spoiling your view is not a good enough argument.
On a similar note, I think land based windfarms are quite beautiful and cannot fathom how they would be more of a danger to drivers than the purpose built distraction that is the Angel of the North?
Samantha M, Reading,
Come on Edward and Jenny : you know why they are just in England.This government is kept in power by its Scots and Welsh MPs.Or am I just being cynical ?
Keith Vaughan, Great Stretton, Leicestershire
If you NIMBYs don't want eco-towns as a sustainable way to provide the new housing we so badly need for our growing population, an acceptable alternative might be to send the objectors to live Poland and other eastern European countries so they can fill the vacuum created by migrant workers coming here.
If you don't want your roads congested, as you assert, sell your cars. We have become a nation of selfish bigots.
Simon G, Derby,
Brown and the 'New' Labour government have lost the plot!
Do we really have to wait until 2010 to get rid of them?
This is yet another overpaid consultant led idea of Labour
By the way, why are they just in England?
Edward, Newbury, UK
Which grinning consultants came up with this genius plan?Another Green gimmick from the featherweights runnings this country and us into the ground. Long Marston is surrounded by narrow country lanes and is about ten minutes from a B road. No rail links. Token bus service. Half an hour to a motorway. People are stranded without a car in this part of Warwickshire and Stratford is already an all day traffic jam. What a joke.
Stan, shipston-on-stour,
Enough is enough. Wildlife already has to compete unfairly with increased urbanisation. What will be left for our grandchildren? Has the govt considered any sites in Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland? Why only England?
Jenny, caterham, surrey
If as you reported in Public Agenda on the 1st April, no more than half of all households of an Eco Town will be allowed to own a car can we assume that the houses for such households will have neither garages or garage space? Who is going to police these households to ensure that no one within such household has an 'illegally' owned vehicle? To ensure that all the needs of residents are catered for it would be necessary that the first things to be built would be shops, schools, medical facilities, work facilities and entertainment and all be operational as the residents start to move in. The Eco Town theory might sound nice but will it work out in practice?
Gort Measey, Countesthorpe, Leicestershire.
Elsenham in Essex? Great! That should be the straw that breaks the back of the railway that already struggles to cope with commuter traffic to London and the Stansted Express route (even before any expansion) on just one line each way. Of course, there's always the M11, but that's already choc-a-bloc (and only 2 lanes for much of its length).
Paul, Bishops Stortford,
I am staggered that Pennbury in Leicestershire is on the shortlist.How can this site, which contains most beautiful farmland and is English countryside at its best ,be considered a brownfield site just because of a small airstrip in the middle of it? What dishonesty - it is quite disgraceful.
The impact it will have on Leicester services e.g.hospitals and traffic is horrendous.Virtually touching Leicester it will just be an additional suburb.
What unprincipled times we live in!
Marion Symonds, Birmingham, West Midlands
I think that everyone, including Tony Henman should pipe down and wait to see the full plans before pressing their opinions on the nation. Who cares if Tim Henman grew up in Weston - hes not exactly the national treasure like his father seems to think he is.
Rosemarie, Weston-on-the-Green,
The proposed eco town development outside Stratford Upon Avon is totally proposterous. I ask Gordon Brown himslef to visit Stratford during the summer months when he will see the town already overwhelmed by traffic both from tourists and residents alike. The town is already swamped by the number of new houses that have aeady been built in the last few years and most aspects of the infrastruture simply can't cope.
With the devlopment of an eco town, traffic congestion will only get worse as transport links are simply not ready to serve such a development. Furthermore, where will all of these people work? Plus,. there is already a shortage of school places in Stratford and surrounding areas - surely this is only going to further exacerbate this problem.
I am at the end of my tether as the government continues to ruin heritage and green Brtiain.
Current Resident of Stratford on Avon
James Thomas, Stratford on Avon, Warwickshire