Ben MacIntyre: Commentary
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
It takes a special sort of rudeness to decide that the customer is not only wrong, but a twerp who can take his complaint and “stick it”.
In Britain, we pride ourselves equally on our politeness and our ability to give offence. We are also uniquely good at insulting the very people we are supposed to be most polite to: the customer, the client, the reader, the guest and the voter.
Anyone who provides a service may feel a sneaking sympathy for David Clelland. You have spent all day working hard – whether filling the supermarket shelves, serving the hotel guests or listening to your constituents – and then someone you have never met sends a letter or e-mail tearing a strip off you. The red mist descends. Mr Clelland’s mistake was to put his red mist into words.
But he is not alone. Anthony Cobley, managing director of the Atlantic Hotel in Newquay, recently hit the headlines after sending a spectacularly rude letter to a woman who had been refused a glass of tap water in his restaurant and then dared to complain.
“I buy the water from the South West Water Company. I buy the glasses the water is served in. I buy the ice that goes in the water and I buy the labour to serve the water . . .
and you think I should provide all this free of charge,” ranted this reincarnation of Basil Fawlty. “Customers who only drink water and complain about paying for it I can certainly do without.”
Fawlty Towers is squirmingly funny because it so thoroughly subverts the notion that the customer is always right: “You ponce in here expecting to be waited on hand and foot, while I’m trying to run a hotel,” Basil screams. “Have you any idea of how much there is to do? Do you ever think of that? Of course not, you’re all too busy sticking your noses into every corner, poking around for things to complain about . . .”
In 222 years, The Times has very occasionally received a rude letter of complaint, but has never responded in kind, so far. Kelvin MacKenzie, however, former Editor of The Sun, was once heard shouting down the telephone at a woman reader who had called to complain: “Right! You are now banned from reading The Sun.” Her husband later called to inquire whether he was banned too. He was.
Anyone tempted to send a rude letter, or to send an offensive reply to a rude letter, might well follow the example of the late, great Colonel Alfred Wintle, an eccentric and irascible figure who was imprisoned in the Tower of London in 1939 for trying to steal an aircraft with which he intended to invade France, single-handedly. In 1946, Colonel Wintle wrote to The Times from the Cavalry Club: “Sir, I have just written you a long letter. On reading it over, I have thrown it in the wastepaper basket. Hoping this will meet with your approval, I am Sir . . .”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
No sympathy whatsoever for Mr Clelland - he was elected to work FOR his constituents not to abuse them
His constituent challenged him to defend his voting record and explain his position on issues; instead Mr C resorted to ad hominem attacks
Children doing this usually have something to hide..
Simon, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Bernard is right - Mr Clelland is supposed to represent all his constituents, not just the ones who write to him and then shout loudest when releasing correspondence to the media.
Neil, Edinburgh, UK
On this occasion, no. The MP is an EMPLOYEE of the electorate and one whom the electorate is stuck with for 5 years with no choice bar moving home to escape.
Tim Carpenter LPUK, London, UK
I agree with Bernard,one of the the many duties it to handle weird submissions, all part and parcel of the job, glean out the actual parts relating too his job and to put forward/represent those views.
He wasn't elected to represent his own views, but those of electroate.
Some MP's have forgotten.
Peter, Stoke, England
"do you feel a sneaking sympathy?"
Not one iota. Mr Clelland is supposed to represent all the constituents of his seat, not just those who agree with him.
He may feel that his is a safe Labour seat and he can speak his mind. The former may be true but he may find it is not his sinecure.
Bernard, Edinburgh, Scotland