Daniel Foggo
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
A MAN who admits that mobile phone usage may have caused a tumour in one of his ears is helping to introduce wifi networks emitting the same kind of radiation to hospitals and colleges.
Eight years ago Peter Lyons was left without the use of half of his face after an operation to remove an acoustic neuroma in his phone-using ear.
Now he is network development manager for the Open Learning Partnership, a charity that provides people with access to the internet.
Recent research has linked acoustic neuromas with mobile phone usage. Lyons said that, despite his concerns about being overexposed to electromagnetic radiation, the use of the wireless networks, or wifi, is justified because they are not operated close to the body like mobiles.
The ambiguous position in which Lyons finds himself comes amid concern over the potential long-term impact of wireless radiation on health. Last week the Health Protection Agency, the government watchdog, announced research into the impact of wifi on people’s wellbeing. About half of primary schools and most secondaries have wifi networks.
Lyons, 63, began using an Orange mobile phone 10 years ago. Two years later he experienced deafness in his left ear and an examination revealed a tumour. In removing it, surgeons severed a vital nerve, leaving him with a lopsided face.
About four years after his operation Lyons, who had been involved in the information technology industry, began working for the Open Learning Partnership, which has the motto “anywhere, anytime”.
He is now involved in putting wifi into hospitals, and his charity is dealing with five NHS trusts ranging from London to Cheshire. Although Lyons dismissed the suggestion that wireless networks are dangerous, he admitted he had some concern about the overall level of electromagnetic radiation to which people were being subjected.
He continues to use a mobile but tries to restrict calls to a minute in length. “Your body can handle a certain amount and it is the duration of the exposure that counts,” he said.
Lyons said that until recently he had not considered the possibility that mobile phone usage might have led to his tumour. But, after installing wifi for a client, “I found there has been a lot of research in the past year into electromagnetic frequencies. A Swedish study linked acoustic neuromas to mobile phone usage, although the increase in incidence was very small”.
That research found long-term users of mobiles were 2½ times more likely to get the tumours, although Lyons noted that it had still not established a direct link.
He remains concerned that there is not enough independent research: “You’ve got the mobile phone industry, which has a vested interest in downplaying the safety aspects, and a government which makes a huge amount of money selling spectrum [of microwave frequencies]. And then you’ve got a research community which is funded by the government and industry.”
However, he believes any risk from wifi is minimal. “People get confused between wifi and mobile phones but one gives out just a fraction of the radiation of the other if you look at how they are used. I have a wifi device in my pocket, but I don’t hold it to my head. Holding it away from your body reduces by a quarter the amount of radiation you get.”
He added: “Wifi gives out a far less powerful output than any mobile phone mast. The radiation is less than you would get from a microwave oven. So unless we are going to do away with mobile phones there is no logic in doing away with wifi.”
Mobile phone firms and manufacturers of wifi networks say there is no proven link between the radiation and ill health.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Many thousands of scientists, consultants, and doctors believe that radiation from wireless devices (which use broadly the same microwave fequencies as mobile phones) are associated with a range of adverse health effects, such as loss of concentration, headaches, nausea, fatigue, memory and behavioural problems, as well as more serious illnesses such as cancers. Indeed, the German Government recently advised its citizens to reduce their exposure to wireless radiation, and to use cabled internet connections.
Moreover, in September 2007 the EU's European Environment Agency (EEA) concluded that the UK's safety limits for radiation from wireless devices are 'thousands of times too lenient', and for 'health authorities to recommend actions to reduce exposures, especially to vulnerable groups, such as children'. Our safety limits are only intended to protect against short term heat shock and burn exposures, and so do not protect against adverse health effects from long term 'low' level
Dr Andrew Orr, London,
Five years ago I recognised an impaired hearing in one ear and an MRI revealed that I had a 2cm acoustic neuroma. An othanks to peration to remove the neuroma surgically was proposed but thanks to the web I was able research the matter and learn of the relativelly high risk s and particularly of collateral damage to facial etc. nerves. I also learnt about an alternative treatment - Gamma SRS, It;'s a walk-in and a few hour later, walk-out exercise.
I elected for the Gamma SRS and I'm most thankful that I did . My numerous ensuing MRI's show a quite remarkable and progressive shrinking of the neuroma and with no collateral problems.
I feellextremely sorry for Mr. Lyons and wonder if he was duly warned of the risks of the surgery and advised of the Gamma SRS treatment.
D, Lloyd., Toronto , Canada
I do believe there is a possibility cell phones can have a direct link to an acoustic neuroma. I did have an acoustic neuroma and was fortunate enough to find a surgeon here in the United States that performs the surgery by way of the endoscopic approach. I encourage anyone with any brain tumor to contact The Skull Base Institute in Los Angeles. Dr. Shahinian will remove the tumor through a tiny hole in your skull without damaging any nerves
Wanda Plumlee, Haskell, Ok
Unfortunately, there is no linear relationship between the strength of the signal and its biological effects. Their peak values occur within "windows" of signal strength, above and below which there is little or no effect. We cannot therefore assume that because the Wifi signal is weaker than that of a mobile phone that it must be safe. It could in fact be more dangerous. For a brief scientific explanation of why this is and its likely effects on health, please visit: - http://tinyurl.com/28lo82
Andrew Goldsworthy, London, UK
That man Peter makes a lot of sense. I think he should get a pay rise from the OLP. And more interviews like this one. This is compulsive reading!
Sandrine, London, UK
It is regretable to read about Mr Lyons health problems that might have been adversely compounded by mobile phone use, however it is important to point out that it might be inappropriate to infer that WIfi might be safe if it is compared to handset emmisions. The Moscow signal schwarzenberg study and many others charitably ignored by reviewers do show health effects and the levels are similar to those in a typical Wifi settings. Ignoring the science then saying it does not exist raises a credibilty issue. It is time for hard decisions to be made and the publics health needs to be safeguarded.
panayis zambellis, luton,
I was treated for an Acoustic Neuroma in 1986, when mobile phones were the size of suitcases. I know they didn't cause my problem. The charity BANA (British Acoustic Neuroma Assoc) has been unable to allocate "blame" as far as I am aware.
I am sceptical, but common sense suggests that it is not a good idea to clamp a mobile phone to your ear (or be a drummer in a rock band).
Gillian Harris, Beaconsfield, UK