Mark Henderson, Science Editor
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
Legislation that prevents sperm donors from remaining anonymous has not deterred men from coming forward as doctors had feared: the number donating actually increased in the first year after the reforms.
Figures released yesterday show that the number of men registering as sperm donors increased by 6 per cent in the year after April 1, 2005, when the new rules came into effect.
Fertility clinics and sperm banks registered 265 new sperm donors with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the past year, compared with 250 in the past 12 months of anonymity. The number of new donors based in Britain has also gone up, from 197 to 208.
The rise is surprising because many fertility doctors had expected the loss of anonymity to deter men and women from donating sperm and eggs, for fear that they would be contacted by any offspring when they reached the age of 18.
Most clinics already had an acute shortage of donated sperm and eggs before the law was changed, and there was widespread concern that the new regime would worsen waiting lists that often run into years.
The new figures indicate that the change has not adversely affected the number of men prepared to donate sperm.
Doctors think that the slight increase has probably been caused by the publicity given to the law change, which may have encouraged some men to think for the first time about donation.
Fertility specialists said that although the increase was welcome there remained a shortage of donated sperm and eggs.
Mark Hamilton, chairman of the British Fertility Society, said: “The BFS notes with interest the HFEA’s report of a slight increase in the number of sperm donors registering in the UK in 2006. The BFS remains concerned that availability of sperm donation services remains patchy at best throughout the country. The Society is aware of several centres which have now withdrawn donor insemination services to patients, and for those who may be fortunate to be able to access treatment, costs and waiting times have greatly increased.”
Laura Witjens, chairwoman of the National Gamete Donation Trust, said: “It is encouraging to see that the hard work put into recruiting willing-to-be-known donors is starting to pay off. However, it is crucial to remember that we haven’t reached the required 500 sperm donors per year and we are nowhere near solving the problem of the shortage of egg donors.
“Most of the increase in numbers is down to the sustained work of a small number of committed clinics.”
Shirley Harrison, chairman of the HFEA, said: “The decision by Parliament to remove anonymity for those sperm and egg donors who registered after April 1, 2005, has always been controversial.These new figures show that the predicted drop in sperm donor numbers is a myth.
“Professionals working in the sector say that there are a complex set of reasons which led to a fall in donor numbers from 1997. The British Fertility Society, the National Gamete Donation Trust and other organisations have been looking at ways to improve the numbers of sperm donors recruited.
“More and more clinics are increasing their efforts to recruit sperm donors. These figures show that these efforts have been paying off and that number are continuing to increase.”
The rules
—Sperm donors who provided samples before April 1, 2005, have the right to remain anonymous
—Donors who gave sperm on or after April 1, 2005, can be contacted by offspring when they reach the age of 18
—Sperm donors must be aged between 18 and 45
—A maximum of 10 families can be created using sperm from any one donor
—Sperm or egg donors may claim up to £250 for lost earnings
Source: HFEA
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I'm 18 and also donor conceived but I am shocked to see how many of you appear so bitter. Indeed Ive questioned who my Father is, but rather than wallowing in selfpity, I thank that wonderful man for allowing me a life and allowing my parents a child who without him, wouldn't have been possible.
Leah Duffy, London, England
Yes, well instead of wallowing in self pity (there are others far worse off in this world) thank yourselves lucky you were actually born and wanted and have access to a computer to vent your feelings too. Many do not. Would the donor fathers want to meet the possibly dozens of donor children they have produced? If you come from a stable and happy family biological or not you will thrive. If you have deep seated family and personal problems it will be hell to move on.
Poppy, New York,
The market derives the ethics so the fact that there is not a fall in supply of sperm is a relief! Im a donor offspring who opposes donor conception in the first place, I view known donor conception is a lesser of two evils. When will people realise that the inability to be raised by ones biological parent, is as serious a loss as the inability to biologically parent a child. Infertility is not intentionally created, however our loss is. Donor fathers are targeted and recruited to cede their paternal rights, by government funded charities why is our government supporting such intentional parental abandonment? I believe that creating parents from the infertile by creating children without their parents is a very wrong way to address infertility.
Joanna Rose, Totnes, England
How sad that so many people are falsely under the impression that donating sperm is similar to donating blood or a lock of hair. As a donor conceived offspring, it makes little difference whether my biological father was out of the picture before my birth or after my birth. It is still a great loss not knowing half of my biological roots - both for emotional reasons and medical reasons. In a way, it is like being "half" adopted. And one more thing . . . don't be fooled into thinking all sperm donors walk away without a single thought. A great many men are searching for their offpsring at this very moment.
Sandra, New York, NY
I think the question of sperm donors has always been a sticky one. When you think of all the men pulling together to help childless couples out, it really is a selfless act. I can't help but think though that it's all part of natural selection.
kirk, Rotherham, UK
Sorry Sally, but you can't just deny facts like this.
"Sperm donors" are fathers of children who will never be involved in their lives and will never have meaningful relationships with them. That's a fact.
Now, a priori, there's not necessarily anything wrong with this, but when you do your research you will discover a huge number of donor-conceived people like me who are desperately distressed about this.
Tom, Cambridge,
I am very sorry for all those who are unable to concieve naturally. However, it seems absolutely horrendous to me that donors before 2005 are able to remain anonymous. The unborn child is the most important person in this situation and the fact that they have no right to find out who their biological father/mother is is outrageous. As an objective viewer I can say that it is selfish of those who are reproductively challenged to expect a child to give up their right to knowing their biological parents regardless of how much love and care they bestow upon the creation.
Kate, Salisbury, UK
Thats ridiculous, no sperm donor is abandoning their baby, they are enabling people such as your mother to have an opportubity to be involved in the miracle of the creation of life.... i.e you,. Without them people would go childless needlessly or have to try and offer themselves out.... I think sperm doning is an excellent solution to a fundemental problem
Richard, Geneva,
Its hardly abanding their children to strangers. They have selflessly donated some cells which have the potential to become children to people who cannot for whatever reason provide their own sample.
I am sure in the majority of times the sperm in question would have been wasted otherwise and certainly not gone onto procreate.
Sally, Bristol,
I'm torn in two directions by this news.
On the one hand, as a donor-conceived person myself, I'm very upset that even more men are signing up to abandon their children to strangers.
On the other hand I'm pleased that critics of the revocation of anonymity for "sperm donors" no longer have the excuse that "donor numbers are falling".
Tom, Cambridge,