Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express

Washington will send a senior official to meet the Iranian nuclear negotiator this weekend in the most significant American diplomatic contact with Iran since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
In a major policy shift, William Burns, the third most senior member of the US State Department, will travel to Geneva in Switzerland to attend talks between Tehran and European officials.
The move will not technically end a White House pledge to refuse to negotiate with Tehran until they halt all uranium enrichment because Mr Burns will attend the meeting to listen to the Iranian response to proposals over sanctions rather than enter into negotiations himself.
Last month, Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States presented Iran with an offer of technological incentives and a pause in increasing sanctions in exchange for suspending uranium enrichment work.
Representatives of those countries will meet Iran’s nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, alongside Javier Solana, the EU’s foreign policy chief.
After a series of bullish statements from Tehran and Washington, this weekend’s meeting signals a significant intensification of diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis over Iranian nuclear ambitions.
Senator Barack Obama, the next Democratic presidential candidate, has already indicated that he would be open to negotiations with Iran if certain conditions were met. His aides last night backed the change in White House policy that will be formally announced later today.
Iranian and US officials, including Condoleezza Rice, the Secretary of State, have held several meetings in Baghdad to discuss joint concerns about Iraq, but they have not discussed the diplomatic tensions between Washington and Tehran over the nuclear problem.
A State Department official said last night Mr Burns would not participate in further discussions during the proposed cooling off period. "This is a one-time deal," he said.
Under the suggested deal, if Iran halted its nuclear program for six weeks, Western officials would stop adding to the sanctions they have gradually imposed on Tehran for the same period. Full negotiations would then be timetabled.
In June, when Mr Solana travelled to Tehran to present the offer of negotiations the United States refused to join other members of the international coalition in sending a senior official to the meeting.
Sean McCormack, State Department spokesman, said at the time that no American representative would attend unless "Iran suddenly has a change of tune and says that they will meet the demands of the international community, which are expressed in UN Security Council resolutions".
That policy has now been relaxed but the Iranian leadership remains defiant, at least in its public pronouncements.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, vowed today that Tehran would not accept any threats in negotiations with major world powers over its nuclear drive.
“Iran has decided to take part in negotiations but it will not accept any threat,” state television quoted him as saying.
“Iran’s red line are very clear,” he added, referring to the country’s repeated refusal to accept UN demands to suspend uranium enrichment.
At the Geneva meeting, Mr Jalili is expected to present Iran’s formal response to the package of economic and diplomatic incentives.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I wanted to comment on the story, but after reading one of the posted "HAVE YOUR SAY" comments from John in Johannesburg, SA (see below) - Iran is a threat because it stated in comments that it wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth perhaps using nuclear weapons! You want that ?
Robert Tilford, McCracken, Kansas USA
Why is USA always intervening in the Middle East affairs and this has been going on for many years now. I think USA is only fighting for oil. Well, Sadam is out of the picture now but they're still in Iraq, what'e hell do they want now. There's no longer UN, its USN, "United States Nations".
John, Johannesburg, South Africa
Mr Siddiqui, Pakistan currently posseses nuclear technology and weapons. France is helping Libya develop a civilian nuclear program. The US has issues with a state that sponsors terrorism being able to produce and distribute nuclear weapons. Negotiations have always involved allowing nuclear energy
Jay, London, UK
Why is Senator Obama's perspective any more important that Senator McCain's? You appear to have already elected Obama. 4 months before the ballots are cast.
David Alley, Chandler, AZ, USA
I don't understand that why USA wouldn't allow any muslim countary to have the nuclear energy. What is the thought behind it, and what is they affiared
Mr. Siddiqui, Sharjah,